16.07.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

181<br />

Chapter 5 Findings<br />

In another set <strong>of</strong> documentation a nurse had documented that staff respect the<br />

resident’s wishes for care:<br />

“Patient informed that his wishes will always be taken on board.”<br />

However, overall this element <strong>of</strong> resident autonomy was not evident in 87%<br />

(n=33) <strong>of</strong> documentation.<br />

Chart 5.10: Element 2<br />

Care plans are negotiated. Family are involved.<br />

87%<br />

5.7.3 Element 3: Residents Delegate Care Needs<br />

This element was judged to be evident if there was evidence <strong>of</strong> promoting<br />

resident capacity, and that residents subsequently delegated care based on that<br />

capacity. The criterion stated that a resident’s level <strong>of</strong> independence would be<br />

documented and the level reviewed over time. Specific evidence was required in<br />

relation to what a resident can and cannot do for themselves, e.g. “can brush own<br />

hair, can do zips but not buttons”.<br />

13%<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> the documentation revealed a lack <strong>of</strong> specificity in relation to<br />

what residents could or could not do for themselves. While the level <strong>of</strong><br />

Evident<br />

Not Evident<br />

independence was usually documented at the initial admission assessment, it was<br />

noted to lack a detailed account <strong>of</strong> what a resident could or could not do for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!