Global Report on Human Settlements 2007 - PoA-ISS
Global Report on Human Settlements 2007 - PoA-ISS
Global Report on Human Settlements 2007 - PoA-ISS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
124<br />
Security of tenure<br />
At least 2 milli<strong>on</strong><br />
people are victims of<br />
forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
every year<br />
Forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s are<br />
often accompanied<br />
by the use of<br />
excessive force …,<br />
such as arbitrary<br />
arrests, beatings,<br />
rape, torture and<br />
even killings<br />
Table 5.4<br />
A selecti<strong>on</strong> of major<br />
urban evicti<strong>on</strong> cases<br />
since 1985<br />
Source: COHRE<br />
(www.cohre.org/evicti<strong>on</strong>s);<br />
Davis, 2006a, p102<br />
secti<strong>on</strong> outlines the scale and impacts of three major<br />
categories of evicti<strong>on</strong>s: forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s; market-based<br />
evicti<strong>on</strong>s; and expropriati<strong>on</strong> and compulsory acquisiti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The categories are not mutually exclusive, and the real<br />
causes underlying the evicti<strong>on</strong>s may be very similar. For<br />
example, many cases of so-called ‘expropriati<strong>on</strong> for the<br />
comm<strong>on</strong> good’ may well be a c<strong>on</strong>venient way of getting rid<br />
of communities who are c<strong>on</strong>sidered as ‘obstacles to development’.<br />
Three major causes of large-scale evicti<strong>on</strong>s are also<br />
discussed below.<br />
Forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Large-scale forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s and mass forced displacement<br />
have been part and parcel of the political and development<br />
landscapes for decades as cities seek to ‘beautify’<br />
themselves, sp<strong>on</strong>sor internati<strong>on</strong>al events, criminalize slums<br />
and increase the investment prospects of internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
companies and the urban elite. As recognized by the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Campaign for Secure Tenure, most forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s share a<br />
range of comm<strong>on</strong> characteristics, including the following:<br />
• Evicti<strong>on</strong>s tend to be most prevalent in countries or parts<br />
of cities with the worst housing c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
• It is always the poor who are evicted – wealthier populati<strong>on</strong><br />
groups virtually never face forced evicti<strong>on</strong>, and<br />
never mass evicti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
• Forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s are often violent and include a variety<br />
of human rights abuses bey<strong>on</strong>d the violati<strong>on</strong> of the right<br />
to adequate housing.<br />
• Evictees tend to end worse off than before the evicti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
• Evicti<strong>on</strong>s invariably compound the problem that they<br />
were ostensibly aimed at ‘solving’.<br />
• Forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s impact most negatively up<strong>on</strong> women<br />
and children. 30<br />
Forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s are the most graphic symptom of just how<br />
large the scale of tenure insecurity is and how severe the<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sequences can be of not enjoying tenure rights. Table 5.4<br />
charts a porti<strong>on</strong> of the evicti<strong>on</strong> history during the last 20<br />
years, revealing that forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s have often affected<br />
literally hundreds of thousands of people in a single evicti<strong>on</strong><br />
operati<strong>on</strong>. The three most comm<strong>on</strong> types of large-scale<br />
forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s – urban infrastructure projects, internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
mega events and urban beautificati<strong>on</strong> – are discussed<br />
later in this chapter. Other types of forced evicti<strong>on</strong> may be<br />
Year(s) Locati<strong>on</strong> Number of people evicted<br />
1986–1992 Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic) 180,000<br />
1985–1988 Seoul (Republic of Korea) 800,000<br />
1990 Lagos (Nigeria) 300,000<br />
1990 Nairobi (Kenya) 40,000<br />
1995–1996 Rango<strong>on</strong> (Myanmar) 1,000,000<br />
1995 Beijing (China) 100,000<br />
2000 Port Harcourt (Nigeria) nearly 1,000,000<br />
2001–2003 Jakarta (Ind<strong>on</strong>esia) 500,000<br />
2004 New Delhi (India) 150,000<br />
2004 Kolkata (India) 77,000<br />
2004–2005 Mumbai (India) more than 300,000<br />
2005 Harare (Zimbabwe) 750,000<br />
carried out in c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> with efforts to reclaim occupied<br />
public land for private ec<strong>on</strong>omic investment. C<strong>on</strong>flict and<br />
disaster, as well as urban regenerati<strong>on</strong> and gentrificati<strong>on</strong><br />
measures, can also be the source of evicti<strong>on</strong>. The most<br />
frequent cases of forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s, however, are the smallscale<br />
<strong>on</strong>es: those that occur here and there, every day,<br />
causing untold misery for the communities, households and<br />
individuals c<strong>on</strong>cerned.<br />
While forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s are certainly the excepti<strong>on</strong> to<br />
the rule when examining governmental attitudes to informal<br />
settlements, it is clear that this practice – though widely<br />
c<strong>on</strong>demned as a violati<strong>on</strong> of human rights – is still carried<br />
out <strong>on</strong> a wide scale in many countries. Despite the repeated<br />
c<strong>on</strong>demnati<strong>on</strong> of the practice of forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s, milli<strong>on</strong>s of<br />
dwellers are forcibly evicted annually, with hundreds of<br />
milli<strong>on</strong>s more threatened by possible forced evicti<strong>on</strong> due to<br />
their current insecure tenure status and existing urban and<br />
rural development plans that envisage planned forced<br />
evicti<strong>on</strong>s. In the vast majority of evicti<strong>on</strong> cases, proper legal<br />
procedures, resettlement, relocati<strong>on</strong> and/or compensati<strong>on</strong><br />
are lacking. The Centre <strong>on</strong> Housing Rights and Evicti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
(COHRE) has, over the last decade, collected informati<strong>on</strong><br />
about evicti<strong>on</strong> cases from all over the world (see Table 5.5).<br />
Its data is not comprehensive since it collects data from a<br />
limited number of countries <strong>on</strong>ly, and <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong> the basis of<br />
informati<strong>on</strong> received directly from affected pers<strong>on</strong>s and<br />
groups and where the cases at hand are particularly noteworthy.<br />
Yet, the data indicates that at least 2 milli<strong>on</strong> people are<br />
victims of forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s every year. The vast majority of<br />
these live in Africa and Asia.<br />
Despite the numerous efforts by those in the internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
human rights community to prevent evicti<strong>on</strong>s, the<br />
many initiatives to c<strong>on</strong>fer secure tenure to slum dwellers<br />
and the simple comm<strong>on</strong> sense that forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s rarely, if<br />
ever, actually result in improvements in a given city or<br />
country, this practice c<strong>on</strong>tinues, and is often accompanied<br />
by the use of excessive force by those carrying out the<br />
evicti<strong>on</strong>s, such as arbitrary arrests, beatings, rape, torture<br />
and even killings. In a selecti<strong>on</strong> of forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s in <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
seven countries – Bangladesh, China, India, Ind<strong>on</strong>esia,<br />
Nigeria, South Africa and Zimbabwe – between 1995 and<br />
2005, COHRE found that over 10.2 milli<strong>on</strong> people faced<br />
forced evicti<strong>on</strong> during this ten-year period.<br />
While all regi<strong>on</strong>s have faced large-scale forced<br />
evicti<strong>on</strong>s, Africa has perhaps fared worst of all during recent<br />
years. A new study reveals that the practice of forced<br />
evicti<strong>on</strong>s has reached epidemic proporti<strong>on</strong>s in Africa, with<br />
more than 3 milli<strong>on</strong> Africans forcibly evicted from their<br />
homes since 2000. 31 Some of the cases highlighted in that<br />
and other studies include the following: 32<br />
• In Nigeria, some 2 milli<strong>on</strong> people have been forcibly<br />
evicted from their homes and many thousands have<br />
been made homeless since 2000 (see Box 5.9). The<br />
largest individual case occurred in Rainbow Town, Port<br />
Harcourt (Rivers State) in 2001, when nearly 1 milli<strong>on</strong><br />
residents were forcibly evicted from their homes. In<br />
Lagos, more than 700,000 people have been evicted<br />
from their homes and businesses since 1990. 33