27.05.2014 Views

Global Report on Human Settlements 2007 - PoA-ISS

Global Report on Human Settlements 2007 - PoA-ISS

Global Report on Human Settlements 2007 - PoA-ISS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

124<br />

Security of tenure<br />

At least 2 milli<strong>on</strong><br />

people are victims of<br />

forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

every year<br />

Forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s are<br />

often accompanied<br />

by the use of<br />

excessive force …,<br />

such as arbitrary<br />

arrests, beatings,<br />

rape, torture and<br />

even killings<br />

Table 5.4<br />

A selecti<strong>on</strong> of major<br />

urban evicti<strong>on</strong> cases<br />

since 1985<br />

Source: COHRE<br />

(www.cohre.org/evicti<strong>on</strong>s);<br />

Davis, 2006a, p102<br />

secti<strong>on</strong> outlines the scale and impacts of three major<br />

categories of evicti<strong>on</strong>s: forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s; market-based<br />

evicti<strong>on</strong>s; and expropriati<strong>on</strong> and compulsory acquisiti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The categories are not mutually exclusive, and the real<br />

causes underlying the evicti<strong>on</strong>s may be very similar. For<br />

example, many cases of so-called ‘expropriati<strong>on</strong> for the<br />

comm<strong>on</strong> good’ may well be a c<strong>on</strong>venient way of getting rid<br />

of communities who are c<strong>on</strong>sidered as ‘obstacles to development’.<br />

Three major causes of large-scale evicti<strong>on</strong>s are also<br />

discussed below.<br />

Forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Large-scale forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s and mass forced displacement<br />

have been part and parcel of the political and development<br />

landscapes for decades as cities seek to ‘beautify’<br />

themselves, sp<strong>on</strong>sor internati<strong>on</strong>al events, criminalize slums<br />

and increase the investment prospects of internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

companies and the urban elite. As recognized by the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Global</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Campaign for Secure Tenure, most forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s share a<br />

range of comm<strong>on</strong> characteristics, including the following:<br />

• Evicti<strong>on</strong>s tend to be most prevalent in countries or parts<br />

of cities with the worst housing c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

• It is always the poor who are evicted – wealthier populati<strong>on</strong><br />

groups virtually never face forced evicti<strong>on</strong>, and<br />

never mass evicti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

• Forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s are often violent and include a variety<br />

of human rights abuses bey<strong>on</strong>d the violati<strong>on</strong> of the right<br />

to adequate housing.<br />

• Evictees tend to end worse off than before the evicti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

• Evicti<strong>on</strong>s invariably compound the problem that they<br />

were ostensibly aimed at ‘solving’.<br />

• Forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s impact most negatively up<strong>on</strong> women<br />

and children. 30<br />

Forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s are the most graphic symptom of just how<br />

large the scale of tenure insecurity is and how severe the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sequences can be of not enjoying tenure rights. Table 5.4<br />

charts a porti<strong>on</strong> of the evicti<strong>on</strong> history during the last 20<br />

years, revealing that forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s have often affected<br />

literally hundreds of thousands of people in a single evicti<strong>on</strong><br />

operati<strong>on</strong>. The three most comm<strong>on</strong> types of large-scale<br />

forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s – urban infrastructure projects, internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

mega events and urban beautificati<strong>on</strong> – are discussed<br />

later in this chapter. Other types of forced evicti<strong>on</strong> may be<br />

Year(s) Locati<strong>on</strong> Number of people evicted<br />

1986–1992 Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic) 180,000<br />

1985–1988 Seoul (Republic of Korea) 800,000<br />

1990 Lagos (Nigeria) 300,000<br />

1990 Nairobi (Kenya) 40,000<br />

1995–1996 Rango<strong>on</strong> (Myanmar) 1,000,000<br />

1995 Beijing (China) 100,000<br />

2000 Port Harcourt (Nigeria) nearly 1,000,000<br />

2001–2003 Jakarta (Ind<strong>on</strong>esia) 500,000<br />

2004 New Delhi (India) 150,000<br />

2004 Kolkata (India) 77,000<br />

2004–2005 Mumbai (India) more than 300,000<br />

2005 Harare (Zimbabwe) 750,000<br />

carried out in c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> with efforts to reclaim occupied<br />

public land for private ec<strong>on</strong>omic investment. C<strong>on</strong>flict and<br />

disaster, as well as urban regenerati<strong>on</strong> and gentrificati<strong>on</strong><br />

measures, can also be the source of evicti<strong>on</strong>. The most<br />

frequent cases of forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s, however, are the smallscale<br />

<strong>on</strong>es: those that occur here and there, every day,<br />

causing untold misery for the communities, households and<br />

individuals c<strong>on</strong>cerned.<br />

While forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s are certainly the excepti<strong>on</strong> to<br />

the rule when examining governmental attitudes to informal<br />

settlements, it is clear that this practice – though widely<br />

c<strong>on</strong>demned as a violati<strong>on</strong> of human rights – is still carried<br />

out <strong>on</strong> a wide scale in many countries. Despite the repeated<br />

c<strong>on</strong>demnati<strong>on</strong> of the practice of forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s, milli<strong>on</strong>s of<br />

dwellers are forcibly evicted annually, with hundreds of<br />

milli<strong>on</strong>s more threatened by possible forced evicti<strong>on</strong> due to<br />

their current insecure tenure status and existing urban and<br />

rural development plans that envisage planned forced<br />

evicti<strong>on</strong>s. In the vast majority of evicti<strong>on</strong> cases, proper legal<br />

procedures, resettlement, relocati<strong>on</strong> and/or compensati<strong>on</strong><br />

are lacking. The Centre <strong>on</strong> Housing Rights and Evicti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

(COHRE) has, over the last decade, collected informati<strong>on</strong><br />

about evicti<strong>on</strong> cases from all over the world (see Table 5.5).<br />

Its data is not comprehensive since it collects data from a<br />

limited number of countries <strong>on</strong>ly, and <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong> the basis of<br />

informati<strong>on</strong> received directly from affected pers<strong>on</strong>s and<br />

groups and where the cases at hand are particularly noteworthy.<br />

Yet, the data indicates that at least 2 milli<strong>on</strong> people are<br />

victims of forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s every year. The vast majority of<br />

these live in Africa and Asia.<br />

Despite the numerous efforts by those in the internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

human rights community to prevent evicti<strong>on</strong>s, the<br />

many initiatives to c<strong>on</strong>fer secure tenure to slum dwellers<br />

and the simple comm<strong>on</strong> sense that forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s rarely, if<br />

ever, actually result in improvements in a given city or<br />

country, this practice c<strong>on</strong>tinues, and is often accompanied<br />

by the use of excessive force by those carrying out the<br />

evicti<strong>on</strong>s, such as arbitrary arrests, beatings, rape, torture<br />

and even killings. In a selecti<strong>on</strong> of forced evicti<strong>on</strong>s in <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

seven countries – Bangladesh, China, India, Ind<strong>on</strong>esia,<br />

Nigeria, South Africa and Zimbabwe – between 1995 and<br />

2005, COHRE found that over 10.2 milli<strong>on</strong> people faced<br />

forced evicti<strong>on</strong> during this ten-year period.<br />

While all regi<strong>on</strong>s have faced large-scale forced<br />

evicti<strong>on</strong>s, Africa has perhaps fared worst of all during recent<br />

years. A new study reveals that the practice of forced<br />

evicti<strong>on</strong>s has reached epidemic proporti<strong>on</strong>s in Africa, with<br />

more than 3 milli<strong>on</strong> Africans forcibly evicted from their<br />

homes since 2000. 31 Some of the cases highlighted in that<br />

and other studies include the following: 32<br />

• In Nigeria, some 2 milli<strong>on</strong> people have been forcibly<br />

evicted from their homes and many thousands have<br />

been made homeless since 2000 (see Box 5.9). The<br />

largest individual case occurred in Rainbow Town, Port<br />

Harcourt (Rivers State) in 2001, when nearly 1 milli<strong>on</strong><br />

residents were forcibly evicted from their homes. In<br />

Lagos, more than 700,000 people have been evicted<br />

from their homes and businesses since 1990. 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!