21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

148<br />

THE HISTORY OF SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

Focus of Report<br />

The filing of U.S.-based satellite system applications with <strong>the</strong> FCC prompted action by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Executive branch, which has special responsibilities in this field under <strong>the</strong><br />

Communications Satellite Act of 1962, as amended (47 U.S.C. 701 et seq.) including <strong>the</strong><br />

responsibility to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r additional U.S. international satellite systems are<br />

“required in <strong>the</strong> national interest.” The Senior Interagency Group on International<br />

Communication and Information Policy (SIG) reviewed U.S. international satellite policy<br />

to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r, and under what conditions, authorizing satellite systems and services<br />

in addition to INTELSAT would be: (a) consistent with prevailing U.S. law, practice,<br />

and international treaty obligations; (b) compatible with sound foreign policy and<br />

telecommunications policy goals; and, (c) in <strong>the</strong> U.S. national interest. 1<br />

[2] The Executive agencies represented on <strong>the</strong> SIG undertook a study and reached a<br />

unanimous position in favor of new entry, subject to certain limitations. A recommendation<br />

subsequently was made to <strong>the</strong> President by <strong>the</strong> Secretaries of State and Commerce.<br />

The President determined on November 29, 1984, that international satellite systems separate<br />

from INTELSAT were required in <strong>the</strong> U.S. national interest, subject to certain conditions.<br />

Specific criteria relating to <strong>the</strong> President’s determination were <strong>the</strong>n forwarded to<br />

<strong>the</strong> FCC by <strong>the</strong> Secretaries of Commerce and State jointly. See Appendixes A and B.<br />

This report provides background information regarding <strong>the</strong> President’s determination,<br />

and it also provides information on important regulatory and o<strong>the</strong>r parallel measures<br />

which are desirable to ensure that <strong>the</strong> Executive branch’s fundamental policy<br />

goal—an efficient and responsive international communications environment—is<br />

achieved. The discussion here focuses on <strong>the</strong> major communications and information policy<br />

issues raised by <strong>the</strong> applications before <strong>the</strong> FCC. It addresses commercial, trade, and<br />

legal matters, and also examines major U.S. foreign policy interests and concerns.<br />

This report does not seek to resolve all of <strong>the</strong> questions that have been raised regarding<br />

new international satellite systems nor to direct action by <strong>the</strong> FCC on specific pending<br />

applications. It does, however, consolidate much of <strong>the</strong> extensive analysis that has been<br />

undertaken by <strong>the</strong> Executive branch and sets forth <strong>the</strong> requirements applicable to any system<br />

<strong>the</strong> FCC may eventually authorize.<br />

The Executive branch has concluded, in brief, that it is technically feasible, economically<br />

desirable, and in <strong>the</strong> national interest to allow new entry by U.S. firms into <strong>the</strong> international<br />

satellite field. Customers should be afforded both <strong>the</strong> new service options and<br />

<strong>the</strong> benefits of competition among customized service providers that new entry promises.<br />

This can be accomplished, moreover, while maintaining <strong>the</strong> technical integrity of <strong>the</strong><br />

INTELSAT global system and avoiding significant economic harm to that system. U.S. foreign<br />

policy, and international communications and information policy, require a continued<br />

strong national commitment to INTELSAT as “a single global commercial<br />

telecommunications satellite [3] system as part of an improved global telecommunications<br />

network.” 2 But our national commitment to INTELSAT and o<strong>the</strong>r important goals<br />

can be accommodated, provided that new international satellite systems and services are<br />

authorized and regulated along <strong>the</strong> lines discussed in this report.<br />

1. The SIG is composed of representatives of <strong>the</strong> Departments of State, Justice, Defense, and<br />

Commerce; <strong>the</strong> <strong>Office</strong>s of Management and Budget, Science and Technology Policy, Policy Development, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> U.S. Trade Representative; <strong>the</strong> National Security Council; <strong>the</strong> Central Intelligence Agency; <strong>the</strong> U.S.<br />

Information Agency (USIA); <strong>the</strong> Board for International Broadcasting; <strong>the</strong> Agency for International<br />

Development; and <strong>the</strong> National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Commerce and State co-chair <strong>the</strong> SIG<br />

and USIA serves as vice chair.<br />

2. Preamble, Agreement Relating to <strong>the</strong> International Telecommunications Satellite Organization<br />

“INTELSAT,” TIAS 7532, 23 UST 3813, 3814 (1973).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!