21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

170<br />

OBSERVING THE EARTH FROM SPACE<br />

to apply <strong>the</strong> data, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> project would not bring <strong>the</strong> benefits promised. 57 [II-25]<br />

NASA <strong>the</strong>refore became involved not only in promoting <strong>the</strong> use of Landsat data, but<br />

also in supporting research to develop approaches to <strong>the</strong>ir use. One major project<br />

involved agricultural surveys, because better prediction of harvests was one use of Landsat<br />

data that <strong>the</strong> space agency had predicted would bring significant benefits. 58 The Large<br />

Area Crop Inventory Experiment (LACIE) involved NASA, <strong>the</strong> National Wea<strong>the</strong>r Service,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Department of Agriculture in an attempt to develop and test a crop forecasting<br />

system using Landsat data. The data, it was claimed, could provide two things: information<br />

on how much land had been planted in a given crop (assuming one could differentiate<br />

among crops in <strong>the</strong> data) and information on crop health (because badly stressed<br />

vegetation reflected less infrared light). The project achieved reasonable success, but <strong>the</strong><br />

problem of identifying and differentiating crops from satellite imagery turned out to be<br />

much more difficult than expected. 59 [II-26] Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> Department of Agriculture<br />

chose not to adopt <strong>the</strong> system developed by <strong>the</strong> LACIE project for operational use. 60<br />

Several o<strong>the</strong>r experiments were more successful, but use of Landsat data for operational<br />

applications continued to develop more slowly than its promoters had hoped. 61 A NASAsponsored<br />

technology transfer and utilization program involving universities, state and<br />

local governments, and industry could not reverse this reality.<br />

Operational Landsat Program<br />

The development of an operational program became <strong>the</strong> subject of a series of political<br />

debates. Different groups proposed at least three different alternatives. First, <strong>the</strong> federal<br />

government could develop an operational Earth resources program on <strong>the</strong> model of<br />

<strong>the</strong> operational wea<strong>the</strong>r satellite program, providing satellite data for <strong>the</strong> public good.<br />

Second, a private company might take over <strong>the</strong> existing Landsat system and run it as a<br />

business, an option usually called privatization. Third, a private company might develop<br />

and launch a new and separate Earth observations satellite, an option usually called commercialization.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> somewhat disappointing growth of Landsat data use, <strong>the</strong> Department of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Interior wanted an early transition to a government-sponsored operational satellite<br />

program, but <strong>the</strong> agency faced a number of obstacles. [II-27] First, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Office</strong> of<br />

Management and Budget questioned whe<strong>the</strong>r Landsat had yielded enough benefits to justify<br />

a continued government-funded program. 62 [II-28] This issue posed a dilemma: poten-<br />

57. James C. Fletcher to Frank E. Moss, February 20, 1973; Hans Mark to Clifford E. Charlesworth, July<br />

31, 1973; William E. Stoney to Distribution, “Summary Thoughts on Earth Resources Transfer Meeting,” June<br />

27, 1975. All of <strong>the</strong>se documents are in <strong>the</strong> Space Policy Institute Documentary <strong>History</strong> Collection, Washington,<br />

DC.<br />

58. Carroll G. Grunthaver, U.S. Department of Agriculture, to Leonard Jaffe, Deputy Associate<br />

Administrator, NASA, August 22, 1973, discusses a new research and development study to develop a computerbased<br />

system for spring wheat yield estimation.<br />

59. James L. Mitchell, <strong>Office</strong> of Management and Budget, to Richard E. Bell and Don Paarlberg,<br />

Department of Agriculture, “Large Area Crop Inventory Experiment,” October 8, 1976, Space Policy Institute<br />

Documentary <strong>History</strong> Collection, Washington, DC.<br />

60. Mack, Viewing <strong>the</strong> Earth, pp. 146–58.<br />

61. For a story with a successful outcome see John P. Erlandson, Army Corps of Engineers, to R. B.<br />

MacDonald, Johnson Space Center, March 16, 1976, Space Policy Institute Documentary <strong>History</strong> Collection,<br />

Washington, DC; Mack, Viewing <strong>the</strong> Earth, p. 130. For <strong>the</strong> reasons of slow adoption, see letter from Sally Bay<br />

Cornwell, National Conference of State Legislatures, to Allen H. Watkins, EROS Data Center, December 3, 1977,<br />

and letter from Allen H. Watkins to Sally Bay Cornwell, December 22, 1977, Space Policy Institute Documentary<br />

<strong>History</strong> Collection, Washington, DC.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!