21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

388<br />

SPACE AS AN INVESTMENT IN ECONOMIC GROWTH<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Vietnam War were well understood and before <strong>the</strong> large social welfare programs<br />

passed by Congress during <strong>the</strong> administration of Lyndon Johnson attained rapid growth.<br />

This was also before <strong>the</strong> very high inflationary period of <strong>the</strong> 1970s and early 1980s, which<br />

propelled <strong>the</strong> federal government into a deficit and made <strong>the</strong> interest payments on <strong>the</strong><br />

national debt one of <strong>the</strong> largest single components of <strong>the</strong> federal budget, dwarfing even<br />

<strong>the</strong> defense budget.<br />

Early studies commissioned by NASA show that <strong>the</strong> space agency was not unaware of<br />

<strong>the</strong> implications of its spending on <strong>the</strong> economy. However, those impacts were secondary<br />

to NASA’s primary mission of space exploration. A 1965 study by Jack Faucett Associates<br />

found that NASA’s socioeconomic activities were “separate, uncoordinated, and almost<br />

incidental.” The Faucett study recommended that NASA create a headquarters staff devoted<br />

to collecting economic data and coordinating various economic activities throughout<br />

<strong>the</strong> agency. These recommendations were ignored; to this day, <strong>the</strong> agency still addresses<br />

economic policy on an ad hoc and uncoordinated basis. [III-1]<br />

The goal of stimulating economic growth through NASA technology was very much a<br />

side issue to <strong>the</strong> space agency during <strong>the</strong> 1960s and 1970s. For example, a 1968 NASA publication<br />

listing goals and objectives for <strong>the</strong> next decades in space does not mention economic<br />

growth at all, but only refers in passing to <strong>the</strong> facilitation of communications and<br />

navigation as an afterthought to developing space capabilities for managing <strong>the</strong> Earth’s<br />

resources. 3<br />

During <strong>the</strong> 1960s, one of <strong>the</strong> important goals of NASA was to stimulate science and<br />

engineering at <strong>the</strong> universities. NASA sponsored social science and economic studies during<br />

this era, which were oriented primarily toward defining and identifying <strong>the</strong> impact of<br />

NASA expenditures on particular regions. One study, performed at <strong>the</strong> University of<br />

Pennsylvania in its Regional Science Department, was an input-output economic analysis<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Philadelphia economy that developed measures of NASA expenditures on <strong>the</strong><br />

Philadelphia region. 4 There is no evidence that <strong>the</strong> results of this study were ever used by<br />

NASA to publicize <strong>the</strong> local benefits, nor is <strong>the</strong>re any evidence that <strong>the</strong> results directly<br />

influenced NASA policy. The primary purpose and benefit of this study were to support<br />

university research activities and to advance knowledge in regional economic measurement<br />

techniques. NASA also sponsored ano<strong>the</strong>r input-output study by William Miernyk of<br />

West Virginia University during this era. 5 Orr and Jones of Indiana University performed<br />

an industrial breakdown of NASA expenditures to measure national impacts. 6 Again, <strong>the</strong>se<br />

were primarily academic <strong>the</strong>ory-building studies that were not sponsored by policy-making<br />

offices at NASA, nor were <strong>the</strong> results extensively used by <strong>the</strong> space agency in support<br />

of its programs.<br />

In 1974, Mary Holman of George Washington University published a comprehensive<br />

review of <strong>the</strong> ways in which NASA had an impact on <strong>the</strong> economy, based on her research<br />

at <strong>the</strong> agency during <strong>the</strong> late 1960s. 7 According to <strong>the</strong> preface in <strong>the</strong> book, this research<br />

was initiated by concerns that NASA’s associate administrator for manned spaceflight,<br />

George Mueller, had about possible future “serious problems and distortions in several<br />

3. Space Task Group, The Post-Apollo Space Program: Directions for <strong>the</strong> Future, September 1969, published<br />

Document III-25 in John M. Logsdon, gen. ed., with Linda J. Lear, Jannelle Warren-Findley, Ray A. Williamson,<br />

and Dwayne A. Day, <strong>Exploring</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Unknown</strong>: Selected Documents in <strong>the</strong> <strong>History</strong> of <strong>the</strong> U.S. Civil Space Program, Volume I,<br />

Organizing for Exploration (Washington, DC: NASA Special Publication (SP)-4407, 1995), 1:522–43.<br />

4. See Walter Isard, Regional Input-Output Study: Recollections, Reflections, and Diverse Notes on <strong>the</strong><br />

Philadelphia Experience (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1971).<br />

5. William H. Miernyk, Impact of <strong>the</strong> Space Program on a Local Economy: An Input-Output Analysis<br />

(Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press, 1967).<br />

6. L.D. Orr and D. Jones, “An Industrial Breakdown of NASA Expenditures,” November 1969,<br />

Documentary <strong>History</strong> Collection, Space Policy Institute, George Washington University, Washington, DC.<br />

7. M.A. Holman, The Political Economy of <strong>the</strong> Space Program (Palo Alto, CA: Pacific Books, 1974).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!