21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXPLORING THE UNKNOWN 317<br />

ing system through <strong>the</strong> next ten years or more. They present alternatives that could lead<br />

to eventual commercialization of Landsat, but <strong>the</strong>se involve extensive government participation<br />

through various management, joint-operator or financing options. These respondents<br />

are opposed to commercialization of <strong>the</strong> wea<strong>the</strong>r satellite programs, as well as <strong>the</strong><br />

creation of any monopolistic commercial entity for land sensing. It should be noted that<br />

three of <strong>the</strong> nation’s major aerospace industries (RCA, GE, and Hughes) share this basic<br />

position.<br />

A. Remote Sensing Center, University of Massachusetts (UMass)<br />

The UMass proposal is somewhat ambiguous but looks to an evolutionary, step-bystep<br />

approach leading toward commercialization. However, <strong>the</strong>y believe <strong>the</strong> current systems<br />

would require extensive federal support if a transfer to private industry were<br />

attempted in <strong>the</strong> near-term. In <strong>the</strong> UMass plan, individual segments of <strong>the</strong> current systems<br />

would be modified and gradually replaced by <strong>the</strong> private sector until full commercialization<br />

of <strong>the</strong> land sensing system was achieved. They doubt that total private-sector ownership/operation<br />

of <strong>the</strong> wea<strong>the</strong>r sensing system is feasible now or in <strong>the</strong> foreseeable future.<br />

(1) Responsiveness to Federal Needs:<br />

Insufficient information is provided to permit an evaluation; however, a<br />

phased take-over should fulfill user needs initially.<br />

(2) Continuity of Service:<br />

Information provided is indeterminate for evaluation; comments in <strong>the</strong> preceding<br />

paragraphs apply.<br />

[18] (3) Feasibility:<br />

The plan for stepwise commercialization can be implemented within current<br />

technology. The subsystems of data receive/record, command and control, image<br />

processing, assessment and analysis, and communications and distribution are<br />

readily separable. The distributed processing proposed is subject to <strong>the</strong> same comments<br />

as for Terra-Mar. The (apparent) desire for a central archive, as well as local,<br />

limited archives, is technically feasible; it requires only a data management decision.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> “existing systems would be unaffected,” federal global modeling<br />

capacities would not be affected in <strong>the</strong> near-term (8–10 years). However, <strong>the</strong> proposal<br />

postulates eventual replacement of government sensors by private sensors<br />

which could acquire “Landsat-like” data. It seems unlikely that <strong>the</strong> requirements<br />

for more advanced sets of multispectral data can be satisfied by Landsat-like private<br />

sensors. For example, geological researchers are finding that spectral resolutions<br />

on <strong>the</strong> order of 10–20 nanometers within <strong>the</strong> short wavelength region<br />

(1.1–2.6 micrometers) and 30–50 nanometers within <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal region (8–14<br />

micrometers) are showing enormous promise for extracting unique signatures of<br />

surficial minerals, <strong>the</strong>reby allowing inferences on subsurface content and structure.<br />

These capabilities are beyond <strong>the</strong> spectral resolutions on Landsat.<br />

(4) National Security and Foreign Policy Concerns:<br />

This response mentions some aspects of national security and foreign policy<br />

issues—e.g., providing priority wea<strong>the</strong>r service to DOD. However, <strong>the</strong> entire concept<br />

is drawn up in <strong>the</strong> context of U.S. coverage only, with no provision for meeting<br />

federal needs for foreign area data, or for serving foreign users.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!