21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Although we are in <strong>the</strong> early stages of assessing options, initial indications from<br />

EOSAT, <strong>the</strong> system’s operator, are that Landsat 5 could continue to operate for several<br />

more years even though it is already 9 years old and well past its design life. Consequently,<br />

<strong>the</strong> likelihood of a significant data gap may not be as great as originally anticipated, assuming<br />

that Landsat 7 is launched on schedule. However, we do have serious concerns with<br />

<strong>the</strong> coverage of <strong>the</strong> earth and <strong>the</strong> site revisit time of Landsat 5. Landsat 6 would have<br />

addressed <strong>the</strong>se concerns and added some additional capabilities that would have fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

increased <strong>the</strong> competitiveness and utility of <strong>the</strong> Landsat system.<br />

OSTP in conjunction with <strong>the</strong> DOD, NOAA, and NASA is carefully considering<br />

options to address both <strong>the</strong> loss of Landsat 6 and <strong>the</strong> cost and risk of <strong>the</strong> Landsat 7 program.<br />

These two items are linked because <strong>the</strong> availability of Landsat 7 directly affects when<br />

or if a replacement spacecraft for Landsat 6 should be launched. As you are aware <strong>the</strong> current<br />

budgetary environment has made it necessary to examine options in terms of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

cost and risk; <strong>the</strong>refore, I want to assure you that any alternatives to <strong>the</strong> current program<br />

will undergo careful interagency review in order to evaluate potential impacts relative to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Landsat program’s diverse requirements and users. [2] Fur<strong>the</strong>r, I would like to assure<br />

you that any proposal for responding to <strong>the</strong> loss of Landsat 6 or for significantly modifying<br />

<strong>the</strong> current Landsat program will address data continuity; impacts on agency budgets;<br />

schedule impacts; <strong>the</strong> acquisition, launch and operation of <strong>the</strong> necessary satellites and<br />

instruments; and <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>the</strong> user communities.<br />

The necessary interagency review will be expedited to meet <strong>the</strong> needs of FY95 budgetary<br />

decision timetables. However, it is important to make clear that no decision on program<br />

alternatives has been or will be taken prior to <strong>the</strong> completion of this review.<br />

I look forward to working with you on this important issue and will provide a more<br />

detailed discussion of <strong>the</strong> alternatives being considered in <strong>the</strong> near future.<br />

The Honorable George E. Brown, Jr.<br />

Chairman<br />

Committee on Science, Space and Technology<br />

U.S. House of Representatives<br />

Washington, DC 20510<br />

EXPLORING THE UNKNOWN 371<br />

Sincerely yours,<br />

[hand-signed: “Jack”]<br />

John H. Gibbons<br />

Director

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!