21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of a dollar of profit from future operations. This is accomplished by discounting <strong>the</strong><br />

future expenditures and receipts (cash flows) at a constant annual rate. If <strong>the</strong> sum of all<br />

<strong>the</strong> discounted cash flows for a project equals zero, <strong>the</strong>n this rate is defined as <strong>the</strong> rate of<br />

Return on Investment (ROI) or Internal Rate of Return (IRR). This rate is analogous to<br />

an annual after-tax interest rate on <strong>the</strong> dollars at risk. The cash flows for a 10 plant operation<br />

are shown in Figure 12. The shaded areas represent <strong>the</strong> present values of <strong>the</strong> cash<br />

flows discounted at [9] [original placement of Figure 12] <strong>the</strong> rate of return on investment.<br />

The negative cash flows during <strong>the</strong> first three years represent <strong>the</strong> investment for<br />

plant construction. As shown, <strong>the</strong> ROI is 29.5%, which for an effective corporate tax rate<br />

of 48%, is analogous to a pretax return of 57%.<br />

Annual Cash Flow—$M<br />

120<br />

80<br />

40<br />

Figure 12. 10 plant cash flow<br />

0<br />

-40<br />

-80<br />

EXPLORING THE UNKNOWN 507<br />

Cash Flow, Receipts Positive<br />

Present Value at 29.5% Return on Investment (ROI)<br />

Cumulative Cash Flow $248M<br />

Cumulative Present Value 0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />

Year<br />

In a sensitivity analysis of rate of return on investment <strong>the</strong> number of plants, plant first<br />

unit cost, and integrated circuit processing yield (ribbon value) were found to be <strong>the</strong><br />

major cost drivers, while Shuttle transportation cost was found to have a more moderate<br />

effect. The variation of return on investment with <strong>the</strong> total number of plants deployed is<br />

shown in Figure 13. Return on investment for one plant is relatively low, because <strong>the</strong><br />

design, development, test and engineering (DDT&E) costs are approximately equal to <strong>the</strong><br />

plant cost or $16M. As <strong>the</strong> number of plants increases, <strong>the</strong> DDT&E costs are spaced over<br />

more plants and <strong>the</strong> plant unit cost is decreased by a 91% learning curve, thus increasing<br />

return on investment. The return on investment for <strong>the</strong> selected 10 plant baseline (5% of<br />

1985 market) is calculated as 29.5%. The number of plants also has an effect on <strong>the</strong> payback<br />

period or time required for <strong>the</strong> manufacturer to get his investment [original placement<br />

of Figure 13] back as shown in Figure 14. This figure shows cumulative cash flows,<br />

with <strong>the</strong> low points reflecting <strong>the</strong> maximum cash investment, <strong>the</strong> crossover points, <strong>the</strong> payback<br />

periods, and <strong>the</strong> end points <strong>the</strong> total after tax earnings. For <strong>the</strong> baselined 10 plants,<br />

<strong>the</strong> maximum investment is $120M, <strong>the</strong> payback period is 5.3 years, and <strong>the</strong> total net earnings<br />

are $248M.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!