21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXPLORING THE UNKNOWN 257<br />

have been based on incredibly bad advice.<br />

Follow intensive review in <strong>the</strong> early days of this Administration President Nixon proposed<br />

in his 1970 budget start of a major earth resources satellite experiment. In his<br />

speech before <strong>the</strong> General Assembly of <strong>the</strong> United Nations on September 18, 1969, <strong>the</strong><br />

President reaffirmed his commitment to an earth resources satellite program.<br />

Ambassador Yost has undertaken fur<strong>the</strong>r initiative with Secretary General U Thant to<br />

implement <strong>the</strong> President’s commitment.<br />

During November 1969, Dr. DuBridge discussed with Canadian representatives <strong>the</strong><br />

basis of <strong>the</strong>ir collaboration with <strong>the</strong> United States in <strong>the</strong> earth resources satellite program.<br />

Dr. Paine’s support for <strong>the</strong> program as a major high payoff component of our space<br />

effort was publicly stated on a National TV appearance within <strong>the</strong> past ten days.<br />

The EROS-ERTS program has exceptionally strong support within <strong>the</strong> Congress.<br />

Interior 1970 budget proposals were not only approved but increased. The House<br />

Committee on Science and Astronautics terms <strong>the</strong> program “. . . perhaps <strong>the</strong> best possible<br />

opportunity to achieve tangible economic returns from <strong>the</strong> substantial investment already<br />

made by <strong>the</strong> American taxpayer in <strong>the</strong> U.S. space program.” The Committee has been vigorous<br />

in its advocacy of <strong>the</strong> earth resources concept and has urged expedited action on<br />

<strong>the</strong> EROS-ERTS programs.<br />

The program has attracted widespread professional, public, industrial, scientific, and<br />

academic interest throughout <strong>the</strong> Nation and <strong>the</strong> World.<br />

The abrupt change in Administration policy proposed by [<strong>the</strong> Bureau of <strong>the</strong> Budget]<br />

cannot help but become a major embarrassment to <strong>the</strong> Administration. The Budget<br />

Bureau has advanced no adequate rationale in support of its action. Accordingly <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

no basis for its defense by myself and my staff before <strong>the</strong> Congress or <strong>the</strong> public.<br />

I understand funds for <strong>the</strong> NASA ERTS program were cut because [<strong>the</strong> Bureau of <strong>the</strong><br />

Budget] claimed <strong>the</strong> resolution capability of <strong>the</strong> proposed system did not meet needs of<br />

<strong>the</strong> use[r] agencies. This is not <strong>the</strong> case. Dr. Pecora and o<strong>the</strong>r user agency authorities<br />

wrote NASA clarifying this point and I believe <strong>the</strong>se letters have been furnished to your<br />

examining staff. We support <strong>the</strong> technical discussion provided by NASA in defense of <strong>the</strong><br />

ERTS program. The questions posed in <strong>the</strong> Interior “passback” have been previously<br />

answered by <strong>the</strong> numerous independent appraisals of <strong>the</strong> earth resources concept and<br />

program and <strong>the</strong> Issue Papers provided by this Department in prior years.<br />

The course of action proposed by <strong>the</strong> Bureau of <strong>the</strong> Budget affects our ‘70 program<br />

as well as our 1971 budget. For this reason a decision must be made as soon as possible.<br />

If, after consideration of this appeal, you are still unable to recommend that <strong>the</strong> program<br />

proceed as planned, I propose that <strong>the</strong> issue should be discussed by myself and<br />

Administrator Paine with <strong>the</strong> President at his earliest convenience.<br />

Document II-22<br />

Document title: Robert P. Mayo, Director, Bureau of <strong>the</strong> Budget, to Honorable Walter J. Hickel,<br />

Secretary of <strong>the</strong> Interior, April 14, 1970, with attached: “Statement for Senator Mundt.”<br />

Source: Record Group 51, Records of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Office</strong> of Management and Budget, Federal<br />

Records Center, Suitland, Maryland.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> Bureau of <strong>the</strong> Budget wanted to block spending on an Earth resources survey system,<br />

NASA and <strong>the</strong> Department of <strong>the</strong> Interior maintained moderate program support through congressional<br />

pressure as well as through direct appeals to <strong>the</strong> president. NASA was given <strong>the</strong> go-ahead to work on<br />

two experimental satellites, while <strong>the</strong> U.S. Geological Survey in <strong>the</strong> Department of <strong>the</strong> Interior would<br />

build a data-processing facility in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, but only if <strong>the</strong> satellites’ performance<br />

demonstrated <strong>the</strong> need for it. The latter development was made possible with <strong>the</strong> intervention of South<br />

Dakota Senator Karl Mundt, who lobbied strenuously for ERTS funding in <strong>the</strong> Department of <strong>the</strong><br />

Interior after Sioux Falls was designated as <strong>the</strong> preferred location for <strong>the</strong> data-processing facility.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!