21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

258<br />

[1] APR 14, 1970<br />

Honorable Walter J. Hickel<br />

Secretary of <strong>the</strong> Interior<br />

Washington, D.C.<br />

Dear Wally:<br />

OBSERVING THE EARTH FROM SPACE<br />

I am concerned that you and your staff feel that you have experienced embarrassment<br />

in justifying <strong>the</strong> Administration’s position on <strong>the</strong> EROS program. I want to reassure you<br />

that <strong>the</strong> President and <strong>the</strong> Bureau carefully reviewed this program and we believe that <strong>the</strong><br />

approach developed is a realistic one for <strong>the</strong> development of this new technology.<br />

In our informal communications to your staff on <strong>the</strong> FY 1971 allowances, and also in<br />

material prepared for your review with <strong>the</strong> President on <strong>the</strong> FY 1971 budget, <strong>the</strong> rationale<br />

for this approach was explained. We note from your congressional justifications for <strong>the</strong> FY<br />

1971 budget that you have supported <strong>the</strong> Administration’s decision on this program by<br />

emphasizing <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> program is still experimental and that no substantial investments<br />

will be made now for facilities and equipment which would be needed for a possible<br />

follow-up operational system. We hope that this letter will fur<strong>the</strong>r clarify <strong>the</strong><br />

Administration’s position and be helpful to you in any necessary streng<strong>the</strong>ning of your<br />

presentation to Congress. It is important for all of us that <strong>the</strong> interested members in<br />

Congress clearly understand <strong>the</strong> Administration’s position.<br />

This Administration is placing high priority on <strong>the</strong> development of practical applications<br />

of space technology. Surveying earth resources is one of <strong>the</strong> applications which<br />

appears to be potentially productive. In an effort to explore this potential, <strong>the</strong> National<br />

Aeronautics and Space Administration is seeking authorization from Congress to proceed<br />

with <strong>the</strong> development of two experimental Earth Resources Technology Satellites.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> space program of <strong>the</strong> Seventies will not be characterized by <strong>the</strong> pursuit of a<br />

single goal. We are attempting to develop a space program with a balanced emphasis on<br />

exploration, science and applications.<br />

We recognize that <strong>the</strong> FY 1971 budget allowance for <strong>the</strong> EROS program is somewhat<br />

smaller than your request. In our judgment, a constructive program of preparation for<br />

useful application of ERTS data can be developed within <strong>the</strong> resources provided. I am sure<br />

that you are aware [2] that NASA’s request was also reduced. While an increase has been<br />

allowed for actual satellite development, <strong>the</strong> NASA budget does not provide for increases<br />

requested for o<strong>the</strong>r parts of <strong>the</strong>ir earth resources program.<br />

We must emphasize that this program is an experimental effort. We do not believe<br />

that it is prudent to invest substantial resources at this time in preparing for an operational<br />

system capable of analysis of all ERTS data. Present funding for NASA will focus on<br />

satellite development while Interior and Agriculture will concentrate on continued<br />

research relating to potential applications of ERTS data and preparation for use of <strong>the</strong><br />

data once it becomes available.<br />

The Administration does not want to move beyond <strong>the</strong> experimental phase of this<br />

program until we are confident that <strong>the</strong> benefits of <strong>the</strong> program are more than <strong>the</strong> expected<br />

costs. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> evidence is unclear as to <strong>the</strong> technological capability of ERTS to<br />

provide pictures with sufficient resolution to give <strong>the</strong> payoff claimed in some studies that<br />

have been undertaken thus far. Until we have greater assurances on <strong>the</strong>se points, <strong>the</strong><br />

financial commitment to <strong>the</strong> programs should remain at a minimum level.<br />

We have previously furnished to your staff a copy of <strong>the</strong> enclosed statement which was<br />

supplied to Senator Mundt’s office. The statement outlines <strong>the</strong> Administration’s position

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!