21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62<br />

THE HISTORY OF SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

problems relating to <strong>the</strong> future authorization of commercially operable space communication<br />

systems. It was stated in <strong>the</strong> Notice that it may not be feasible to have more than<br />

one or a limited number of commercial satellite communication systems due to <strong>the</strong> substantial<br />

capital investment required and limitation of radio spectrum space; and that this<br />

raises a problem as to <strong>the</strong> manner in which such a system or limited number of systems<br />

could be accommodated within <strong>the</strong> Commission’s policy of fostering beneficial competition<br />

in <strong>the</strong> international communication field and within <strong>the</strong> anti-trust laws. Accordingly,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Notice solicited views from all interested parties as to <strong>the</strong> best plan of [e]nsuring that<br />

international communications common carriers, and o<strong>the</strong>rs, participate on an equitable<br />

and non-discriminatory basis in a single or limited number of satellite systems. Views were<br />

also solicited as to <strong>the</strong> legality of <strong>the</strong> suggested plan; <strong>the</strong> Commission’s authority to prescribe<br />

such plan; and <strong>the</strong> extent to which participants in <strong>the</strong> plan would be subject to <strong>the</strong><br />

Commission’s jurisdiction. The Notice directed that responses <strong>the</strong>reto be filed on or<br />

before May 1961 and that replies to such responses be filed on or before May 15, 1961.<br />

2. Responses have been filed by twelve parties, viz., American Rocket Society;<br />

American Securities Corporation (for <strong>the</strong> future Western Union International, Inc.);<br />

American Telephone and Telegraph Company; General Electric Company; General<br />

Telephone & Electronics Corporation; Hawaiian Telephone Company; International<br />

Telephone & Telegraph Corporation (and American Cable & Radio Corporation);<br />

Lockheed Aircraft Corporation; Press Wireless, Inc.; Radio Corporation of America (and<br />

RCA Communications, Inc.); The Western Union Telegraph Company; and <strong>the</strong><br />

Department of Justice (commenting only on anti-trust matters).<br />

3. Replies to such responses were filed by American Telephone and Telegraph<br />

Company, General Electric Company, and Lockheed Aircraft [476/2] Corporation.<br />

4. In general, <strong>the</strong> respondents were in agreement that for economic and o<strong>the</strong>r reasons<br />

a single satellite communications system or a limited number of systems, financed<br />

and owned by private enterprise, would best serve <strong>the</strong> public interest. To <strong>the</strong> extent that<br />

<strong>the</strong> respondents addressed <strong>the</strong>mselves to a specific type of plan, <strong>the</strong>y generally favor a<br />

joint venture for <strong>the</strong> ownership and operation of a system. The principal difference<br />

among respondents in this respect related to <strong>the</strong> composition of such a joint venture.<br />

Thus, American Telephone and Telegraph Company and International Telephone and<br />

Telegraph Corporation favor ownership in such a system being limited to international<br />

communications common carriers, such entities participating in ownership to a degree<br />

consistent with <strong>the</strong>ir use of <strong>the</strong> system; General Telephone & Electronics Corporation<br />

would limit <strong>the</strong> ownership to both domestic and international communications common<br />

carriers; while Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, 1 General Electric Company, and The<br />

Western Union Telegraph Company favor ownership by common carriers, <strong>the</strong> manufacturing<br />

companies, and possibly <strong>the</strong> public.<br />

5. Upon consideration of <strong>the</strong> responses and <strong>the</strong> replies filed herein <strong>the</strong> Commission<br />

has arrived at certain conclusions, <strong>the</strong> application of which will serve to foster and accelerate<br />

<strong>the</strong> ultimate establishment of a commercially operable space satellite communication<br />

system in <strong>the</strong> public interest.<br />

6. We have concluded that <strong>the</strong> recommendations made herein with respect to <strong>the</strong><br />

formation or arrangement of a joint venture (or joint undertaking) composed only of<br />

existing common carriers engaged in international telephone and telegraph communication<br />

is deserving of consideration and exploration as an effective means of promoting <strong>the</strong><br />

orderly development and effectuation of such a system. We believe that, under<br />

1. Lockheed in its reply comments withdrew its proposal that ownership in a satellite system include<br />

private interests o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> international carriers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!