21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Return on Investment*—$M<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Figure 15. Plant cost sensitivity (10 plants)<br />

The sensitivity of rate of return on investment to integrated circuit processing yield<br />

improvement is shown in Figure 16. As noted earlier, <strong>the</strong> integrated circuit processing cost<br />

savings determine its allowable cost premium over ground processed material. The importance<br />

of this parameter prompted an independent assessment of yield improvement from<br />

<strong>the</strong> Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation (ICE), a consulting firm to <strong>the</strong> industry.<br />

For a composite market, with a ratio of MOS device sales to bipolar device sales of 3 to 1,<br />

<strong>the</strong> processing yield for .38 cm x .38 cm baseline chips using space processed material is<br />

expected to increase from 14% for ground material to 25% for space manufactured ribbon.<br />

It should be noted that a yield increase of only 5% would result in a rate of return<br />

on investment comparable to current industry operations.<br />

[Figure 16 originally placed here]<br />

[11] The sensitivity of return on investment to Shuttle user charge is shown in Figure 17.<br />

The estimated Shuttle user charge of $21M per launch amounts to a cost of about<br />

$840 per kg. This cost is a significant portion of <strong>the</strong> silicon ribbon manufacturing cost per<br />

kg, so return on investment decreases rapidly with increased Shuttle user charge.<br />

[Figure 17 originally placed here]<br />

0<br />

29.5%<br />

[12] 6.0 RISK ASSESSMENT<br />

EXPLORING THE UNKNOWN 509<br />

* After Taxes<br />

Estimated Cost $16M<br />

(Excluding DDT&E)<br />

0 10 20 30 40<br />

Plant First Unit Cost—$M<br />

To compare <strong>the</strong> 29.5% rate of return on investment for ten plants with a typical industry<br />

return on investment of 10% requires that it be adjusted for risk. In industry this is usually<br />

done by requiring a higher expected rate of return on investment for new projects<br />

than that resulting from current operations. In our survey of four crystal manufacturers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!