21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

474<br />

Commercial Space Industry in <strong>the</strong> Year 2000<br />

A Market Forecast<br />

[1] I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

A. INTRODUCTION<br />

SPACE AS AN INVESTMENT IN ECONOMIC GROWTH<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> most remarkable facts of our industrial society is <strong>the</strong> accelerating rate of<br />

progress. Our scientific knowledge and understanding of <strong>the</strong> universe doubles now in less<br />

than a generation, and we have had more progress in <strong>the</strong> past fifty years than in <strong>the</strong> preceding<br />

millennium in terms of practical impact. It is interesting to note that economists<br />

predict that a substantial percentage of <strong>the</strong> jobs that will exist in <strong>the</strong> year 2010 (i.e.<br />

25 years from now) do not exist now; ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>y will be created by <strong>the</strong> dynamism of new<br />

industries made possible by technologies which are only beginning to emerge from laboratories<br />

today.<br />

Our nation’s brief history in space is an unparalleled example of this trend. While <strong>the</strong><br />

United States had been investigating space and began to develop rudimentary space technologies<br />

after <strong>the</strong> close of World War II, our civilian space programs did not begin in<br />

earnest until <strong>the</strong> creation of NASA in 1958. In a little more than a quarter of a century, we<br />

have come to understand <strong>the</strong> requirements of living and working in space.<br />

Importantly, <strong>the</strong> way we look at <strong>the</strong> heavens is changing. For <strong>the</strong> first two decades,<br />

NASA’s space programs had three primary objectives: <strong>the</strong> advancement of scientific<br />

knowledge about our universe; <strong>the</strong> development of an engineering capability which<br />

enabled us to conduct manned and unmanned operations in space; and <strong>the</strong> pursuit of<br />

heroic feats of exploration reminiscent of those of <strong>the</strong> maritime explorers of centuries<br />

ago. Now, we are beginning to look at space as a place of enterprise. The Administration<br />

and NASA have both come out strongly in support of commercial investment in space,<br />

and have expended considerable amounts of talent in order to understand what <strong>the</strong><br />

Government can do to encourage <strong>the</strong> private sector to invest in a new industrial frontier.<br />

This report focuses on <strong>the</strong> year 2000, and projects <strong>the</strong> commercial revenues for six<br />

space industries: satellite communications, materials processing in space (MPS), remote<br />

sensing, on-orbit services, space transportation, and ground--based support. Revenues are<br />

for U.S. industry only, and are stated in 1985 dollars. The projections do not take into<br />

account revenues accruing to <strong>the</strong> private sector through <strong>the</strong> R&D expenditures of <strong>the</strong> government<br />

(e.g. <strong>the</strong> NASA space station program is not included). However, government<br />

purchases of commercially developed space hardware and products are included (for<br />

example, government purchases of commercial upper stages). High and low scenarios<br />

have been generated for each industry. Under <strong>the</strong> low scenario, extremely conservative<br />

assumptions have been used in defining [2] <strong>the</strong> product or service and its market. Under<br />

<strong>the</strong> high scenarios, more optimistic assumptions have been used.<br />

The satellite communications, MPS and remote sensing markets can be considered<br />

“Applications Markets” in that some aspect of space is critical to <strong>the</strong> provision of service.<br />

Satellite communications and remote sensing profit from <strong>the</strong> vantage point afforded by<br />

space; MPS utilizes o<strong>the</strong>r physical attributes of space (most notably microgravity) to produce<br />

materials which cannot be made on Earth. Space transportation, on-orbit services,<br />

and ground support, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, can be considered “Infrastructure Markets.” They<br />

are not end products in <strong>the</strong>mselves, but are necessary for <strong>the</strong> provision of o<strong>the</strong>r products.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!