21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>the</strong> desired average expected return on investment was 20.8%, or a risk premium of about<br />

11% over current operations. The 29.5% projected return on investment for silicon ribbon<br />

manufacturing exceeds this criterion by a substantial margin.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r more comprehensive method of risk analysis is to evaluate risk as a function<br />

of time and <strong>the</strong>n risk-adjust <strong>the</strong> cash flows for use in calculating a risk adjusted rate of<br />

return. To do this, first <strong>the</strong> technical, legal, and market risks associated with <strong>the</strong> commercial<br />

space manufacturing of silicon ribbon are evaluated.<br />

Evaluation of technical risk required definition of <strong>the</strong> research and development<br />

activities for <strong>the</strong> silicon ribbon process and process apparatus. The research and development<br />

required was divided into three phases, ground and sounding rocket research and<br />

development, Shuttle sortie development, and pilot plant demonstration. A proposed<br />

timetable for <strong>the</strong>se activities is shown in Figure 18. The approximate cost of <strong>the</strong>se activities<br />

is $36M, not including launch costs. For <strong>the</strong> purpose of risk analysis, three objectives<br />

were identified as being necessary to <strong>the</strong> technical implementation of space manufacturing;<br />

basic process development, manufacturing plant development, and mission operations.<br />

These objectives were divided into thirty-six technical risk elements in three levels<br />

of detail similar to a work breakdown structure. These elements were <strong>the</strong>n classified as<br />

(1) proven space technology, (2) existing knowledge requiring development for space<br />

application, and (3) new technology requiring research. The applicable range of probability<br />

of success for <strong>the</strong>se categories is: (1) greater than 0.99, (2) more than 0.95 but less<br />

than 0.99, and (3) less than 0.95, respectively. A subjective evaluation was made of where<br />

<strong>the</strong> risk for each element fell within <strong>the</strong> applicable range. The results of this analysis are<br />

shown in Figure 19. The probability of technical success increases with time from 0.22<br />

today, to 0.48 at <strong>the</strong> completion of ground and sounding rocket research and development<br />

in 1981, to 0.69 at <strong>the</strong> completion of Shuttle sortie process demonstration, and finally<br />

to 0.95 at <strong>the</strong> completion of a pilot plant demonstration in 1985.<br />

Figure 18. Research and development schedule<br />

EXPLORING THE UNKNOWN 511<br />

Microgravity Flights<br />

Ground Experiments<br />

Physical Properties<br />

Meniscus Shaping<br />

Process Apparatus Development<br />

Sounding Rocket<br />

Physical Properties<br />

Melt Stability and Liquid/Solid Interface<br />

Melt-Seed Interaction<br />

Crystal Growth in Microgravity<br />

Crystal Morphology<br />

Meniscus Shaping in Microgravity<br />

Shuttle Sorties<br />

Meniscus Shaping<br />

Melt/Feed Rod Interaction<br />

Continuous Crystal Growth<br />

Reseed Effects<br />

Thermal and Mechanical Control<br />

Solar Furnace<br />

Prototype Process Operation<br />

76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!