21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

514<br />

Probability of Success<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

Figure 21. Space manufacturing implementation risk<br />

SPACE AS AN INVESTMENT IN ECONOMIC GROWTH<br />

Ground &<br />

Rocket R&D<br />

Pilot<br />

Plant<br />

Sortie<br />

R&D<br />

77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90<br />

Year<br />

Production<br />

[16] 7.0 RISK ADJUSTED FINANCIAL RETURN<br />

The combined probability of successful implementation of <strong>the</strong> space manufacture of<br />

silicon ribbon is <strong>the</strong> product of <strong>the</strong> technical, legal, and market success probabilities given<br />

in Figure 21. The cash flows were adjusted for risk by considering each year as a fork of a<br />

decision tree. The value associated with continuing <strong>the</strong> project for a year is <strong>the</strong> cash flow<br />

for that year and <strong>the</strong> value associated with failure is zero. Risk adjusted cash flows are <strong>the</strong><br />

product of <strong>the</strong> year’s cash flow and <strong>the</strong> series probability of continuing <strong>the</strong> project<br />

through that year. Using <strong>the</strong>se cash flows, risk adjusted returns on investment were calculated<br />

for <strong>the</strong> years of <strong>the</strong> commercial design, plant fabrication, and production,<br />

1982–1990. The resulting risk adjusted rate of return on investment versus time is shown<br />

in Figure 22. While <strong>the</strong> expected rate of return after <strong>the</strong> five years of production in 1990<br />

is 29.5%, <strong>the</strong> risk adjusted rate of return when <strong>the</strong> private sector would first commit to<br />

development in 1982 is 14%. This is greater than <strong>the</strong> rate of return for continuing ground<br />

based operations and could justify initiation of commercial development at that time. It<br />

should be realized that this favorable risk adjusted return on investment assumed government<br />

sponsored research and development through <strong>the</strong> pilot plant demonstration in<br />

1984. If industry assumed <strong>the</strong>se risks and cost, <strong>the</strong> risk adjusted rate of return today would<br />

be 4%, and because <strong>the</strong> 4% is less than <strong>the</strong> 10% typical return on investment for earth<br />

based operations, industry would probably not invest. This means that <strong>the</strong> government<br />

will most likely have to [original placement of Figure 22] sponsor <strong>the</strong> process research<br />

and development for space manufacturing to become a reality.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> government to participate in any activity it is necessary that it be in <strong>the</strong> public<br />

interest. In general, advancing technology is considered to fall in this category because<br />

of <strong>the</strong> impetus it provides for continued economic growth. An example of government<br />

sponsorship of commercially applicable technology is NASA’s work in satellite communication.<br />

Although Telstar in 1962 was advertised as a $50M investment by a commercial<br />

firm, AT&T, <strong>the</strong> government had already spent approximately ten times that amount to<br />

develop and demonstrate <strong>the</strong> potential of space communications. This technology was<br />

later applied by <strong>the</strong> Congressionally chartered Communications Satellite Corporation<br />

(COMSAT) in implementing improved international communications.<br />

Legal<br />

Market<br />

Technical<br />

Overall

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!