21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

282<br />

ment—considering <strong>the</strong> budgetary process—are also highly uncertain at this time.<br />

Therefore, I would suggest that no changes be made to present plans for operation of<br />

Landsat C and D. As operational data use develops in <strong>the</strong> next few years, this climate may<br />

change and a broader-based demand for Landsat-type data may emerge. The option for<br />

private sector operation of <strong>the</strong> Landsat system should be reassessed at that time.<br />

Christopher C. Kraft, Jr.<br />

HD/JFMitchell:nmm2/27/76:3751<br />

OBSERVING THE EARTH FROM SPACE<br />

Document II-30<br />

cc:<br />

BD/E. B. Stewart<br />

HB/O. Smistad<br />

HC/R. A. Hoke<br />

Document title: Bruno Augenstein, Willis H. Shapley, and Eugene B. Skolnikoff, “Earth<br />

Information From Space by Remote Sensing,” report prepared for Dr. Frank Press,<br />

Director, <strong>Office</strong> of Science and Technology Policy, June 2, 1978, pp. ii–iv, 1–14.<br />

Source: NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA <strong>History</strong> <strong>Office</strong>, NASA<br />

Headquarters, Washington, D.C.<br />

When this report came out in June 1978, <strong>the</strong> United States had been engaged in an “experimental”<br />

Earth resources observation program since 1966. Although by 1978 <strong>the</strong> program’s ultimate viability<br />

was still not clear, most involved felt it was time to make a policy decision regarding whe<strong>the</strong>r or not<br />

<strong>the</strong> program should be canceled, declared operational, or maintained on an experimental basis until<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r results made a choice more obvious. Among <strong>the</strong> issues facing decision makers was deciding<br />

which government agency should take <strong>the</strong> lead, if indeed an operational system was desired. This<br />

report from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Office</strong> of Science and Technology Policy of <strong>the</strong> Executive <strong>Office</strong> of <strong>the</strong> President examines<br />

<strong>the</strong> issues at hand and recommends NASA as <strong>the</strong> appropriate lead agency. The three authors of<br />

<strong>the</strong> report were consultants to Presidential Science Advisor Frank Press. Bruno Augenstein was a<br />

RAND Corporation scientist with early involvement in Earth observation systems. Willis Shapley was<br />

a long-time top staff official at <strong>the</strong> Bureau of <strong>the</strong> Budget and NASA. Eugene Skolnikoff was a political<br />

science professor who specialized in science, technology, and foreign policy issues at <strong>the</strong><br />

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Included here are <strong>the</strong> executive summary and first two chapters<br />

of <strong>the</strong>ir report.<br />

Earth Information From Space by Remote Sensing<br />

by<br />

Bruno Augenstein<br />

Willis H. Shapley<br />

Eugene B. Skolnikoff<br />

June 2, 1978 . . .<br />

[ii] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

1. The aim of <strong>the</strong> consultants in this report has been to develop policy recommenda-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!