21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

372<br />

The Honorable John H. Gibbons<br />

Assistant to <strong>the</strong> President<br />

<strong>Office</strong> of Science and Technology Policy<br />

Old Executive <strong>Office</strong> Building<br />

Washington, D.C. 20500<br />

[handwritten note: “Jack”]<br />

Dear Dr. Gibbons:<br />

OBSERVING THE EARTH FROM SPACE<br />

Document II-44<br />

December 14, 1993<br />

Thank you for your letter concerning <strong>the</strong> Landsat program. I appreciate your keeping<br />

me informed about <strong>the</strong> review of Landsat issues, but <strong>the</strong> letter does not directly<br />

respond to <strong>the</strong> concerns about Landsat 7 outlined in my letter to you of [handwritten<br />

underlining] August 9. [handwritten note in margin: “(attached)”] Specifically, <strong>the</strong> letter<br />

made no mention of what I believe is <strong>the</strong> most critical issue—resolving <strong>the</strong> differences<br />

between NASA and DOD concerning funding for <strong>the</strong> High Resolution Multispectral<br />

Stereo Imager (HRMSI) on Landsat 7.<br />

I would like to reiterate my strong support for <strong>the</strong> Landsat 7 program and my belief that<br />

HRMSI represents a valuable new capability for both national security and civilian users.<br />

I would like to request again that you personally intervene to provide a solution that<br />

ensures continuation of <strong>the</strong> Landsat 7 program. Any solution should fulfill <strong>the</strong> requirements<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Land Remote Sensing Policy Act (Public Law 102–555), including an integrated<br />

management by NASA and <strong>the</strong> Department of Defense, procurement of Landsat 7<br />

as quickly as practicable that is at least as capable as Landsat 6 would have been, and, where<br />

possible, incorporation of any improvement needed to meet U.S. Government needs.<br />

As always, I stand ready to assist you in any way possible.<br />

Document II-45<br />

Sincerely,<br />

[hand-signed: “George”]<br />

GEORGE E. BROWN, JR.<br />

Chairman<br />

Document title: The White House, Presidential Decision Directive/NSTC-3, “Landsat<br />

Remote Sensing Strategy,” May 5, 1994.<br />

Source: NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA <strong>History</strong> <strong>Office</strong>, NASA<br />

Headquarters, Washington, D.C.<br />

After <strong>the</strong> Department of Defense decided to stop directly participating in <strong>the</strong> Landsat program, policy<br />

makers within <strong>the</strong> Clinton administration faced <strong>the</strong> task of determining how to proceed. After considerable<br />

discussion within <strong>the</strong> Clinton administration’s National Science and Technology Council, with<br />

input from <strong>the</strong> National Security Council, President Clinton signed this directive, which gave NASA<br />

responsibility for procuring Landsat 7, NOAA <strong>the</strong> responsibility for managing operations, and <strong>the</strong><br />

Department of <strong>the</strong> Interior <strong>the</strong> responsibility for distributing <strong>the</strong> data through <strong>the</strong> U.S. Geological<br />

Survey’s EROS Data Center in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!