21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

322<br />

OBSERVING THE EARTH FROM SPACE<br />

data ga<strong>the</strong>red by civil meteorological satellites:<br />

Whereas <strong>the</strong> Federal Government has <strong>the</strong> responsibility for providing forecasts and<br />

warnings regarding severe wea<strong>the</strong>r in order to protect property and public safety;<br />

Whereas <strong>the</strong> United States has engaged for over one hundred years in <strong>the</strong> free international<br />

exchange of meteorological data;<br />

Whereas civil meteorological satellite systems and associated ground system equipment<br />

are essential components in ensuring <strong>the</strong> national security of <strong>the</strong> Nation through<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir use in conjunction with satellites operated by <strong>the</strong> Department of Defense;<br />

Whereas transfer to <strong>the</strong> private sector of ownership or management of any civil meteorological<br />

satellite system and associated ground system equipment would likely create a<br />

Government-subsidized monopoly and jeopardize <strong>the</strong> cost efficiency and reliability of data<br />

ga<strong>the</strong>red by civil meteorological satellites;<br />

Whereas it is highly unlikely that, under <strong>the</strong> current plan for transfer of civil meteorological<br />

satellites, any significant new commercial venture involving marketing of wea<strong>the</strong>r<br />

data would develop;<br />

Whereas skepticism in <strong>the</strong> Congress about <strong>the</strong> transfer of <strong>the</strong> civil meteorological<br />

satellite system could complicate and delay <strong>the</strong> pressing decision about <strong>the</strong> future of <strong>the</strong><br />

civil land remote sensing satellite system; and<br />

Whereas no satisfactory explanations or proposals have been advanced for <strong>the</strong> transfer<br />

of ownership or management of any civil meteorological satellite and associated<br />

ground system equipment to <strong>the</strong> private sector: Now, <strong>the</strong>refore, be it<br />

Resolved by <strong>the</strong> House of Representatives (<strong>the</strong> Senate concurring), that it is <strong>the</strong> sense of <strong>the</strong><br />

Congress that it is not appropriate at this time to transfer ownership or management of<br />

any civil meteorological satellite system and associated ground system equipment to <strong>the</strong><br />

private sector.<br />

The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to <strong>the</strong> rule, a second is not required on this<br />

motion.<br />

The gentleman from Florida (Mr. FUQUA) will be recognized for 20 minutes and <strong>the</strong><br />

gentleman from New York (Mr. CARNEY) will be recognized for 20 minutes.<br />

The Chair recognizes <strong>the</strong> gentleman from Florida (Mr. FUQUA).<br />

Mr. FUQUA. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 2 minutes.<br />

(Mr. FUQUA asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)<br />

Mr. FUQUA. Mr. Speaker, House Concurrent Resolution 168 expresses <strong>the</strong> sense of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Congress that it is not appropriate at this time to sell this Nation’s civilian wea<strong>the</strong>r<br />

satellites to <strong>the</strong> private sector. The purpose of <strong>the</strong> concurrent resolution is to halt <strong>the</strong><br />

administration’s effort to sell <strong>the</strong>se satellites by sending a clear and unambiguous signal<br />

to <strong>the</strong> administration and to U.S. industry that <strong>the</strong> Congress does not consider such a<br />

transfer to be in <strong>the</strong> national interest.<br />

Mr. Speaker, our committee is of <strong>the</strong> view, after reviewing both <strong>the</strong> public testimony<br />

on this issue and <strong>the</strong> administration’s plans for transfer, that <strong>the</strong> proposal to transfer<br />

wea<strong>the</strong>r satellites is not sound and that considerable time, effort, and resources will be<br />

saved by halting this proposal immediately. Our committee reached this conclusion for<br />

several reasons:<br />

The public service nature of wea<strong>the</strong>r services;<br />

The danger of establishing a federally protected monopoly;<br />

National security considerations; and<br />

The need to concentrate <strong>the</strong> debate on commercializing land remote-sensing satellites.<br />

In sum <strong>the</strong> committee concurred with <strong>the</strong> view presented in a November 10, 1983<br />

Joint NASA/Department of Defense study:<br />

There is considerable financial, policy, and program risk to <strong>the</strong> Government in commercializing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!