21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

408<br />

Document III-3<br />

Document title: “Economic Impact of Stimulated Technological Activity,” Final Report,<br />

Midwest Research Institute, Contract NASW-2030, October 15, 1971, pp. 1–11.<br />

Source: NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA <strong>History</strong> <strong>Office</strong>, NASA<br />

Headquarters, Washington, D.C.<br />

This analysis was <strong>the</strong> first truly comprehensive national estimate of <strong>the</strong> returns from NASA R&D<br />

expenditures. It used a methodology developed by Robert Solow based on an aggregate national production<br />

function to estimate overall returns from R&D and <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> subset of NASA R&D impacts.<br />

The results of a seven-to-one return on NASA expenditures and a projected 33-percent discounted rate<br />

of return from 1958 through 1987 were used for many years in press releases and public statements<br />

about <strong>the</strong> beneficial effects of NASA R&D. The following is Part I of what was a three-part report.<br />

Economic Impact of Stimulated Technological Activity<br />

[1] ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF STIMULATED TECHNOLOGICAL ACTIVITY<br />

“The nation’s technological capacity, which is conceptually analogous to <strong>the</strong> capacity<br />

of its physical plant, is unquestionably a nation’s most important economic resource. By<br />

<strong>the</strong> same token, <strong>the</strong> rate at which its technological capacity grows sets what is probably <strong>the</strong><br />

most important ceiling on its long-term rate of economic growth.<br />

The rate of growth of a nation’s technological capacity depends jointly upon <strong>the</strong> rate<br />

at which it produces new technology and <strong>the</strong> rate at which it disseminates <strong>the</strong> old.”<br />

OVERVIEW<br />

SPACE AS AN INVESTMENT IN ECONOMIC GROWTH<br />

Jacob Schmookler<br />

Invention and Economic Growth<br />

1966<br />

The degree to which a nation can satisfy its collective and individual wants is dependent<br />

upon <strong>the</strong> wealth of <strong>the</strong> nation and its citizens. The accumulation of economic wherewithal<br />

is obtained through combinations of labor, capital, and technology. All three inputs<br />

are essential but it is through technological progress that <strong>the</strong> productivity of labor and<br />

capital are increased to obtain more output per unit of input and, consequently, greater<br />

per capita wealth. The United States leads <strong>the</strong> world in <strong>the</strong> generation and application of<br />

technology. Our technological progress poses certain dilemmas, but is also <strong>the</strong> source of<br />

much of <strong>the</strong> economic power we are bringing to bear on societal deficiencies—deficiencies<br />

that many less wealthy nations cannot afford to consider, much less mount assaults<br />

upon.<br />

This volume highlights <strong>the</strong> findings of a research inquiry into <strong>the</strong> relationships<br />

between technological progress and economic development, with emphasis on <strong>the</strong> several<br />

ways in which NASA research and development has aided in <strong>the</strong> accumulation and commercial<br />

application of new or improved scientific and technological knowledge.<br />

[2] Scope of Research<br />

The research undertaken had three separate, but related parts: Part I was an examination<br />

of <strong>the</strong> importance of technological progress in <strong>the</strong> generation of national eco-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!