21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EXPLORING THE UNKNOWN 169<br />

untested technology. 51<br />

Data processing and distribution provided even more serious challenges: a satellite<br />

taking pictures of <strong>the</strong> entire Earth, even at a spatial resolution of about 100 meters, would<br />

quickly produce an overwhelming amount of data. Effective use, particularly coverage of<br />

large areas and repeated coverage of <strong>the</strong> same scene to observe changes, would require<br />

analysis by computer ra<strong>the</strong>r than by a human photointerpreter. However, technology for<br />

such large-scale image processing had not yet been developed in <strong>the</strong> civilian world. 52<br />

Budgetary constraints proved even more serious than technical problems. Facing<br />

declining support for <strong>the</strong> space program once NASA reached its Apollo goal, <strong>the</strong> space<br />

agency’s leaders attempted to capitalize on <strong>the</strong> usefulness of space to promote applications<br />

programs. 53 [II-18, II-19, II-20] The strategy did not work; <strong>the</strong> Bureau of <strong>the</strong> Budget<br />

repeatedly deleted <strong>the</strong> ERTS project from <strong>the</strong> budgets of NASA and <strong>the</strong> Department of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Interior. [II-21] In fact, <strong>the</strong> strategy of promoting usefulness may have backfired: <strong>the</strong><br />

Bureau of <strong>the</strong> Budget (<strong>Office</strong> of Management and Budget after 1970) repeatedly asked<br />

NASA to prove that <strong>the</strong> benefits of Landsat would exceed <strong>the</strong> costs. NASA sponsored <strong>the</strong><br />

required studies and also appealed cuts in <strong>the</strong> project’s budget directly to <strong>the</strong> president. 54<br />

The Department of <strong>the</strong> Interior obtained funding to build a data processing and distribution<br />

center only with <strong>the</strong> help of Republican Senator Karl Mundt of South Dakota.<br />

Senator Mundt had become a major supporter of <strong>the</strong> project when <strong>the</strong> Department of <strong>the</strong><br />

Interior decided to locate its data processing center in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. 55 [II-22]<br />

Despite all <strong>the</strong> discord, <strong>the</strong> first satellite proved a technical success. NASA launched<br />

Landsat 1 on July 23, 1972, and scientists quickly found many uses for <strong>the</strong> data. Prior to<br />

<strong>the</strong> satellite’s launch, NASA had received more than 600 proposals from scientists and o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

requesting funding to investigate uses of data from <strong>the</strong> satellites. More than 200 proposals<br />

from U.S. investigators and 100 from overseas were funded; <strong>the</strong>se scientists stood<br />

ready to use Landsat data as soon as <strong>the</strong>y became available.<br />

The use of Landsat data raised a number of issues. Developing countries had initially<br />

worried about <strong>the</strong> misuse of data ga<strong>the</strong>red without <strong>the</strong>ir consent, but when satellite data<br />

began to arrive, <strong>the</strong>y found it of considerable value in providing information on areas that<br />

were inadequately mapped. [II-23] Despite <strong>the</strong>se benefits, debate continued over international<br />

political and legal issues associated with remote sensing. [II-24] Landsat data<br />

proved useful to scientists of many sorts, for everything from searching for oil to mapping<br />

ice. 56 Yet unlike meteorological satellites, whose data proved more useful to wea<strong>the</strong>r forecasters<br />

than to research scientists building models, Landsat data were quickly used by<br />

researchers, and much more slowly such data found widespread operational use. NASA<br />

leaders discovered that if <strong>the</strong> space agency did not find ways to convince potential users<br />

51. Mack, Viewing <strong>the</strong> Earth, pp. 66–79. NASA was not allowed to use better tested technology that had<br />

been developed for reconnaissance satellites.<br />

52. Badgley to Distribution, “Meeting of Earth Resources User Agency Representatives, April 20, 1967,”<br />

May 4, 1967; Mack, Viewing <strong>the</strong> Earth, pp. 107–18.<br />

53. Leonard Jaffe to <strong>the</strong> Record, “Commentary Delivered by Mr. Leonard Jaffe at <strong>the</strong> Airlie House<br />

Planning Seminar, June 1966,” July 8, 1966, Space Policy Institute Documentary <strong>History</strong> Collection, Washington,<br />

DC.<br />

54. Mack, Viewing <strong>the</strong> Earth, pp. 80–93. This issue continued even after launch. See Paul A. Vander Myde<br />

to George M. Low, February 25, 1975, Space Policy Institute Documentary <strong>History</strong> Collection, Washington, DC.<br />

55. Press release from <strong>the</strong> office of Senator Karl E. Mundt, March, 30, 1970, Space Policy Institute<br />

Documentary <strong>History</strong> Collection, Washington, DC; David L. Stenseth, “EROS—The Local Story,” IDEL Earth Trak<br />

1 (June 1974): 4–5; Mack, Viewing <strong>the</strong> Earth, pp. 132–45.<br />

56. Anthony J. Calio to Director, Johnson Space Center, “Earth Resources Briefing for Petroleum<br />

Industry Representatives,” November 12, 1973; Charles D. Centers to Ma<strong>the</strong>ws, February 15, 1973. Both documents<br />

are located in <strong>the</strong> Space Policy Institute Documentary <strong>History</strong> Collection, Washington, DC.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!