21.03.2013 Views

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

Exploring the Unknown - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

320<br />

report or explicitly address <strong>the</strong> questions outlined in <strong>the</strong> CBD announcement of<br />

September 10, 1982. Comments on <strong>the</strong>se responses are included to express <strong>the</strong> additional<br />

interest generated by <strong>the</strong> Commerce announcement.<br />

A. Autometric, Inc.<br />

Autometric favors <strong>the</strong> move to commercialize civil remote sensing systems but<br />

believes a near-term move is premature, i.e., industry is being placed in a position of bidding<br />

on an unknown entity. If industry miscalculates <strong>the</strong> market, <strong>the</strong> government may have<br />

to “. . . bail <strong>the</strong>m out.” Autometric does propose a quantitative evaluation of <strong>the</strong> relative<br />

merits of <strong>the</strong> Landsat 4 Thematic Mapper, <strong>the</strong> French SPOT [Haute (High) Resolution<br />

Visible on SPOT] HRV sensor, and <strong>the</strong> Large Format Camera that will be flown on <strong>the</strong><br />

Space Shuttle. The evaluation would be used to ascertain <strong>the</strong> commercial value of <strong>the</strong><br />

Thematic Mapper data. No commercialization proposition or comments are provided.<br />

B. Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC)<br />

CSC has been involved with <strong>the</strong> Landsat program since its inception. They do not<br />

comment directly on private sector transfer, but state a keen interest in <strong>the</strong> future of land<br />

sensing and request inclusion in fur<strong>the</strong>r discussions which may be held with industry.<br />

C. Robert Georgevic<br />

This individual described himself as a University Professor from sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

California. He did not respond in detail, but advocates retaining civil remote sensing systems<br />

in <strong>the</strong> U.S. government.<br />

[24] IV. LIST OF RESPONSES<br />

Section Response<br />

OBSERVING THE EARTH FROM SPACE<br />

1.A Report, “Commercialization of Civil Remote Sensing,” Communications<br />

Satellite Corporation (COMSAT), October 22, 1982.<br />

1.B Unsolicited Proposal, Environmental Satellite Data, Inc., September 17, 1982.<br />

1.C White Paper, “Civil Operational Remote Sensing From Space,” Control Data<br />

Corporation, October 1982.<br />

2.A Document TMA 10-011-82, “Civil Operational Remote Sensing From Space,”<br />

Terra-Mar, October 1982.<br />

2.B Report, “Response to <strong>the</strong> Request for Information With Respect to Civil<br />

Operational Remote Sensing From Space,” American Science and<br />

Technology Corporation, October 22, 1982.<br />

2.C Letter to Dr. John H. McElroy, Re: “Civil Remote Sensing Satellites; Request<br />

for Information,” Space Services Incorporated of America, October 22, 1982.<br />

3.A Document, “A Plan for Commercialization of <strong>the</strong> U.S. Civil Remote Sensing<br />

System,” Remote Sensing Center - Hasbrouck, University of Massachusetts,<br />

October 21, 1982.<br />

3.B Report R-4412, “Private Sector Involvement in Civil Operational Remote<br />

Sensing from Space,” RCA, October 22, 1982.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!