03.04.2013 Views

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal Numismatic Society

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal Numismatic Society

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal Numismatic Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

324 FREDK. A. WALTERS.<br />

perfectly circular, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is a broad plain b<strong>and</strong> out-<br />

side <strong>the</strong> legend with a raised marginal line close to <strong>the</strong><br />

edge. This outer b<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> margin have apparently<br />

been turned. 2 <strong>The</strong> legends are <strong>the</strong> usual ones for this<br />

moneyer: Obv. CAESAR AVGVSTVS TRIBVNIC<br />

POTEST; bare head <strong>of</strong> Augustus to right: Rev. C-<br />

CASSIVS CELER III VIR A-A-A-FF; large SC in<br />

centre. <strong>The</strong> weight is 302 grs.,<br />

its module is size 10<br />

according to Mionnet's scale (33-5 mm.). In connexion<br />

with this piece I describe ano<strong>the</strong>r also in my collection,<br />

<strong>and</strong> equally exceptional. It is by <strong>the</strong> same moneyer, <strong>and</strong><br />

also as regards type it is <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong> ordinary as,<br />

although it is ra<strong>the</strong>r larger. It is, however, <strong>of</strong> yellow<br />

brass or aurichalcum. It is perfectly circular, <strong>and</strong> it<br />

also has a turned margin, not so broad as <strong>the</strong> first<br />

piece described, but with a hollow grooved edge. <strong>The</strong><br />

legends are <strong>the</strong> same as those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first piece. <strong>The</strong><br />

weight <strong>of</strong> this coin is 188 grs., <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> module is size<br />

84 (29 mm.).<br />

In Num. Chron., 4th series, vol. iv, Mr. Grueber, in a<br />

paper on <strong>the</strong> bronze coinage <strong>of</strong> Rome <strong>of</strong> this period,<br />

says that <strong>the</strong> sestertius <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> dupondius were<br />

struck in aurichalcum, while <strong>the</strong> as was in copper,<br />

<strong>and</strong> was <strong>the</strong> only denomination on which <strong>the</strong> portrait<br />

<strong>of</strong> Augustus appeared, <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dupondius being<br />

invariably <strong>the</strong> wreath with <strong>the</strong> Emperor's name. I<br />

see no reason for disagreeing with this general rule,<br />

although <strong>the</strong> two pieces I have described are excep-<br />

tions to it, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> question arises as to what <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were intended for. My own suggestion is that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

2<br />

Cp. <strong>the</strong> Vienna coin <strong>of</strong> M. Maecilius Tullus (Willers, Gesch.<br />

rom. Kupferpr., p. 152, No. 217), or that <strong>of</strong> Salvius Otho (ibid.,<br />

PI. xvii, 2], or that <strong>of</strong> Gallius Lupercus (ibid., PI. xiv, 4).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!