03.04.2013 Views

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal Numismatic Society

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal Numismatic Society

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal Numismatic Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COINAGE AND CURRENCY IN ROMAN BRITAIN. 459<br />

silver pieces, which could only have had an ephemeral<br />

existence, is still to seek. Mommsen, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, has pointed out that <strong>the</strong> average weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

silver pieces with which we are dealing estimated by<br />

him at 4-55 grammes, a result closely approaching that<br />

given above corresponded in fact with <strong>the</strong> silver<br />

value <strong>of</strong> Y^O o <strong>of</strong> a pound <strong>of</strong> gold. He concludes <strong>the</strong>re-<br />

fore that <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> " miliarense " was for this reason<br />

attached to <strong>the</strong>se coins, 25 <strong>and</strong> in this he has been more<br />

recently followed by M. Babelon. 26 This piece <strong>the</strong>n<br />

was <strong>the</strong> equivalent <strong>of</strong> 7^ <strong>of</strong> a silver pound, just as <strong>the</strong><br />

Constantinian solidus was -^ <strong>of</strong> a gold pound. Accord-<br />

ing to this reckoning <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> miliarense as<br />

compared with <strong>the</strong> solidus was as 1 to 13-88.<br />

That this equivalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> average weight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

silver t:<br />

medallion" with <strong>the</strong> thous<strong>and</strong>th part <strong>of</strong> a<br />

pound <strong>of</strong> gold attached to it <strong>the</strong> name " miliarense "<br />

is in itself probable enough. <strong>The</strong> miliarense itself<br />

figures too largely<br />

in <strong>of</strong>ficial documents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> time<br />

for it not to have answered to some well-known type<br />

<strong>of</strong> coin. <strong>The</strong> scrinium a miliarensibus, mentioned in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Notitia, 21 is only one <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> indications<br />

that this name was applied to a familiar monetary<br />

class. It is true that in <strong>the</strong> Edict <strong>of</strong> Valentinian II<br />

<strong>and</strong> his colleagues, above cited, <strong>the</strong> name does not<br />

appear. But in a Novella <strong>of</strong> Justinian, which to a<br />

certain extent may be regarded as a reinforcement <strong>of</strong><br />

25<br />

Op. tit., pp. 81, 82.<br />

26<br />

Traite des Monnaies Grecques et Eomaines, i, pp. 569, 570.<br />

27 Notitia Dignitatum Orient-is, c. 12 ; Occiclentis, c. 10. <strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

was in each case under <strong>the</strong> " Comes Sacraruui Largitionum ", <strong>and</strong><br />

was distinct from <strong>the</strong> "Scrinium Argenti" or "Ab Argento", <strong>and</strong><br />

from <strong>the</strong> " Scrinium a Pecuniis " which dealt with bronze coinage.<br />

Cf. Cod. lustinianus, xii. 24. 7.<br />

Hh 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!