07.09.2014 Views

1996 Swinburne Higher Education Handbook

1996 Swinburne Higher Education Handbook

1996 Swinburne Higher Education Handbook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

z'<br />

o<br />

are expected to:<br />

4.4.1 Advise the candidate, at an early stage, of<br />

concerns over progress and/or standard of<br />

work and recommend courses of action by<br />

which the work mav , be ' ~roeressed - or<br />

brought to the appropriate standard.<br />

4.4.2 Discuss with the student the possibilities of<br />

(a) changing the topic, (b) sal;aging the<br />

work by ~ublication, (c) converting to a<br />

lower degree, if the project turns out not to<br />

be feasible.<br />

4.4.3 Notify the Head of School and, if necessary,<br />

the <strong>Higher</strong> Degrees Committee, of any<br />

continuing problems between reporting<br />

periods. (See Statute, Section 8, paragraphs<br />

3 and 4.)<br />

4.4.4 If the need arises, notify the candidate in<br />

writing, of unsatisfactory progress and the<br />

E.<br />

fact that the supervisor may be obliged to<br />

6<br />

recommend termination of candidature.<br />

E 4.4.5 Discuss the matter with the Head of School<br />

E<br />

and consult <strong>Swinburne</strong>'s <strong>Higher</strong> Degrees<br />

a<br />

Committee if there are major concerns over<br />

2'<br />

whether the project, when completed,<br />

m<br />

E<br />

would merit the award.<br />

. 4.5 Completion of the Project and Thesis Submission<br />

W g In the course of a student's preparing a thesis for<br />

submission, supervisors are expected to:<br />

4.5.1 Peruse the thesis drafts and assist the candidate.<br />

where necessary, towards the production of a<br />

thesis of appropriate quality. A supervisor<br />

should not be obliged to read an excessive<br />

number of drafts of the same section or<br />

chapter. Again, it is important that criticism is<br />

given in a constructive, supportive and<br />

sensitive fashion.<br />

4.5.2 Remind the candidate about <strong>Swinburne</strong>'s<br />

requirements for presentation and<br />

submission of a PhD thesis. (See Statute,<br />

Section 9.)<br />

4.5.3 Recommend suitable examiners to the<br />

<strong>Higher</strong> Degrees Committee via the relevant<br />

faculty board/research committee. While<br />

the identities of the examiners are not<br />

revealed to the candidate, the supervisor<br />

should invite the candidate to name<br />

individuals whom they do not wish to be<br />

appointed as examineis. The coordinating<br />

supervisor should also discuss the auestion<br />

of examiners with the second supervisor<br />

before making a recommendation.<br />

Candidates should be advised of courses of<br />

actions which examiners may recommend.<br />

(See Statute, Section 10.)<br />

4.5.4 Be prepared to certify that the thesis is ready<br />

for examination, in accordance with<br />

University requirements. (See Statute,<br />

Section 9.5.)<br />

4.5.5 Remind the candidate that any restrictions<br />

on publication due to confidentiality<br />

requirements should be clearly specified.<br />

(See Statute, Section 12.)<br />

4.5.6 Note that any communication between<br />

supervisor and examiner concerning the<br />

thesis, while the thesis is under examination,<br />

should normally only take place through the<br />

Secretary or Chair of the <strong>Higher</strong> Degrees<br />

Committee.<br />

4.5.7 Work with the candidate to interpret the<br />

comments and guide the rewriting process,<br />

in the event that examiners request rewriting<br />

of the thesis.<br />

5. Guidelines for Condidotes<br />

PhD candidates are expected to:<br />

Understand the administrative processes and<br />

requirements concerning application for<br />

candidature. Candidates should be aware of<br />

the timeframe in which the degree should be<br />

completed. (See Statute, Section 5.4.)<br />

Become familiar with relevant <strong>Swinburne</strong><br />

policies, especially the University's Statute for<br />

the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy and its<br />

Code of Conduct for Research.<br />

Develop a project, in consultation with the<br />

proposed supervisors, of suitable quality for<br />

the degree of PhD. (See Statute, Section 4.)<br />

Liaise with supervisors to produce a suitable<br />

research plan for the proposed project.<br />

Become familiar with any departmental<br />

procedures.<br />

Be aware of the facilities and expertise<br />

available for conduct of the project.<br />

Endeavour ro maintain the progress of the<br />

work in accordance with the plan as<br />

approved by the Divisional and <strong>Higher</strong><br />

Degrees Committee.<br />

Justlfy any changes in the plan, its direction,<br />

and/or time frame. Candidates should inform<br />

the supervisor at an early stage of factors<br />

which might affect the progress of the project.<br />

Take the initiative in raising problems or<br />

difficulties and work with the supervisor to<br />

resolve them.<br />

Provide formal reports in a timely fashion as<br />

deemed necessary by the <strong>Higher</strong> Degrees<br />

Committee, the Division and/or the<br />

supervisor, and ensure sufficient time is<br />

available to adequately investigate and discuss<br />

the work. (See Statute, Section 8.)<br />

Be aware of the University's Occupational<br />

Health and Safety guidelines and adopt safe<br />

working practices relevant to the field of<br />

research.<br />

Become familiar with any relevant procedures<br />

as determined by the <strong>Swinburne</strong> Animal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!