Artemisinin-based combination therapy for ... - The Cochrane Library
Artemisinin-based combination therapy for ... - The Cochrane Library
Artemisinin-based combination therapy for ... - The Cochrane Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2005 IDN; Yeka 2007 UGA; Zongo 2007 BFA). Laboratory staff<br />
were blinded to treatment allocation in five out of six trials.<br />
Total failure<br />
PCR adjusted treatment failure with DHA-P was below 5% in<br />
four out of six studies and with AL6 in two out of six studies.<br />
Of note, one trial from Africa (Kamya 2006 UGA) found PCR<br />
adjusted failure to be > 10% with both <strong>combination</strong>s.<br />
In trials from Africa DHA-P per<strong>for</strong>med significantly better than<br />
AL6 at day 42 (three trials, 1136 participants: PCR unadjusted<br />
Heterogeneity: Chi² P < 0.0001, I² = 91%, Analysis 2.1; PCR<br />
adjusted RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.64, Analysis 2.2). Although<br />
there is substantial heterogeneity among PCR unadjusted results<br />
the direction of effect is consistently in favour of DHA-P.<br />
In the one trial from Asia both drugs per<strong>for</strong>med well with a non<br />
significant trend towards reduced re-infections with DHA-P (one<br />
trial, 356 participants, Analysis 2.1; Analysis 2.2; Analysis 2.3;<br />
Analysis 2.4).<br />
In Oceania Karunajeewa 2007 PNG showed a reduction in PCR<br />
adjusted treatment failure at day 28 with AL6 but this effect was no<br />
longer significant at day 42 (one trial, 356 participants, Analysis<br />
2.1; Analysis 2.2; Analysis 2.3; Analysis 2.4).<br />
P. vivax<br />
Participants treated with DHA-P had significantly fewer episodes<br />
of P. vivax parasitaemia during 42 days follow up (four trials, 1442<br />
participants: RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.43, Analysis 2.5). Of<br />
these four trials only one (Ratcliff 2005 IDN) included participants<br />
with P. vivax co-infection at baseline.<br />
Gametocytes<br />
Four trials reported the development of gametocytes in those negative<br />
at baseline and the results were highly heterogenous and could<br />
not be pooled (four trials, 1203 participants, heterogeneity: Chi²<br />
P = 0.006, I² = 76%, Analysis 2.6). This heterogeneity is consistent<br />
with the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the two drugs <strong>for</strong> total failure. In<br />
the two trials from Uganda (Kamya 2006 UGA and Yeka 2007<br />
UGA) DHA-P had significantly fewer treatment failures and was<br />
also significantly better at reducing gametocyte development. In<br />
trials with no difference <strong>for</strong> treatment failure (Zongo 2007 BFA<br />
and Mens 2007 KEN) there was also no difference in gametocyte<br />
development. Karunajeewa 2007 PNG and Ratcliff 2005 IDN<br />
report no differences in gametocyte carriage between groups but<br />
did not give figures.<br />
Anaemia<br />
Four trials report changes in haemoglobin from baseline to the<br />
last day of follow up (day 28 or 42). <strong>The</strong>re is a non significant<br />
trend towards a benefit with DHA-P but this is unlikely to be of<br />
clinical significance (four trials, 1356 participants, Analysis 2.7).<br />
In addition Karunajeewa 2007 PNG reports that haemoglobin<br />
remained similar in all groups (no figures given).<br />
Adverse events<br />
No significant difference has been shown in the frequency of serious<br />
adverse events (five trials, 2110 participants, Analysis 2.8).<br />
Kamya 2006 UGA and Karunajeewa 2007 PNG report no differences<br />
between groups (two trials, 671 participants). Ratcliff 2005<br />
IDN reports more diarrhoea (P = 0.003) with DHA-P (774 participants).<br />
Mens 2007 KEN reports more weakness (P = 0.035)<br />
with AL6 (146 participants). Yeka 2007 UGA reports more abdominal<br />
pain (P = 0.05) with AL6 (414 participants). Zongo 2007<br />
BFA reports more abdominal pain (P < 0.05) and headache (P<br />
< 0.05) with AL6 (375 participants). For a summary of adverse<br />
event findings see Appendix 4.<br />
Early vomiting<br />
No difference has been shown in the frequency of drug related<br />
vomiting (two trials,1147 participants, Analysis 2.9).<br />
Comparison 3. DHA-P versus artesunate plus amodiaquine<br />
We found two trials (one in Africa and one in Asia) which assessed<br />
this comparison. Allocation concealment was assessed as low risk<br />
of bias in one trial (Hasugian 2005 IDN) and unclear in the other.<br />
In both trials laboratory staff were blinded to treatment allocation,<br />
but other staff and participants were unblinded.<br />
Total failure<br />
PCR adjusted treatment failure with DHA-P was below 5% in<br />
both trials, and below 10% with AS+AQ.<br />
DHA-P per<strong>for</strong>med significantly better than AS+AQ at day 28 (two<br />
trials, 679 participants: PCR unadjusted RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35<br />
to 0.81, Analysis 3.1; PCR adjusted RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23 to<br />
0.94, Analysis 3.2). <strong>The</strong> one trial that reports outcomes at day 42<br />
(Hasugian 2005 IDN) had high losses to follow up (> 20%) at<br />
this time point (Analysis 3.3; Analysis 3.4).<br />
P. vivax<br />
Hasugian 2005 IDN reports significantly fewer episodes of P. vivax<br />
parasitaemia with DHA-P by day 42 (one trial, 170 participants:<br />
RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.74, Analysis 3.5).<br />
Gametocytes<br />
<strong>Artemisinin</strong>-<strong>based</strong> <strong>combination</strong> <strong>therapy</strong> <strong>for</strong> treating uncomplicated malaria (Review)<br />
Copyright © 2009 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Cochrane</strong> Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />
Both trials report no significant differences in gametocyte carriage<br />
during follow up (figures not reported).<br />
12