11.11.2012 Views

Artemisinin-based combination therapy for ... - The Cochrane Library

Artemisinin-based combination therapy for ... - The Cochrane Library

Artemisinin-based combination therapy for ... - The Cochrane Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(Continued)<br />

Vivax efficacy: P.<br />

vivax parasitaemia<br />

by day 63<br />

Transmission<br />

potential: Gametocytedevelopment<br />

(in those negative<br />

at baseline)<br />

Harms: Serious adverse<br />

events (including<br />

deaths)<br />

Harms: Early vomiting<br />

180 per 1000 200 per 1000<br />

(164 to 241)<br />

9 per 1000 28 per 1000<br />

(10 to 79)<br />

7 per 1000 6 per 1000<br />

(3 to 15)<br />

88 per 1000 79 per 1000<br />

(61 to 102)<br />

RR 1.11<br />

(0.91 to 1.34)<br />

RR 3.06<br />

(1.13 to 8.83)<br />

RR 0.9<br />

(0.38 to 2.15)<br />

RR 0.90<br />

(0.69 to 1.16)<br />

1661<br />

(4)<br />

1234<br />

(3)<br />

2617<br />

(8)<br />

2473<br />

(7)<br />

⊕⊕⊕<br />

moderate<br />

4,12,13,14,15<br />

⊕⊕⊕⊕<br />

high 4,11,13,16<br />

⊕⊕<br />

low 4,10,13,17<br />

⊕⊕<br />

low 4,13,18,19<br />

*<strong>The</strong> assumed risk is the mean risk from the studies included in this review, calculated as the number of patients in the control<br />

groups with the event divided by the total number of patients in control groups. <strong>The</strong> corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence<br />

interval) is <strong>based</strong> on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).<br />

CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio<br />

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence<br />

High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.<br />

Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change<br />

the estimate.<br />

Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to<br />

change the estimate.<br />

Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.<br />

Footnotes<br />

1 Data on treatment failure at days 42 and 28 were also available and no differences between the two drugs were shown.<br />

2 Ashley 2003b THA, Ashley 2004 THA and Janssens 2003 KHM.<br />

3 No serious limitations: Allocation concealment was judged to be at ’low risk of bias’ in two trials and ’unclear’ in one. Sensitivity<br />

analysis only including trials with adequate concealment did not substantially change the result. Laboratory staff were blinded in two<br />

of the trials.<br />

4 No serious inconsistency: Heterogeneity was low.<br />

5 No serious indirectness: Trials were conducted in Asia (Thailand and Cambodia) in areas of low and unstable transmission. Children<br />

age < one year and pregnant or lactating women were excluded.<br />

6 No serious imprecision: <strong>The</strong> 95% CI of the pooled estimate includes appreciable benefit with DHA-P over AS+MQ and no appreciable<br />

benefit.<br />

7 Grande 2005 PER.<br />

8 No serious limitations: Allocation concealment was assessed as ’low risk of bias’. No blinding was described in this trial.<br />

<strong>Artemisinin</strong>-<strong>based</strong> <strong>combination</strong> <strong>therapy</strong> <strong>for</strong> treating uncomplicated malaria (Review)<br />

Copyright © 2009 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Cochrane</strong> Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!