13.07.2015 Views

A Record of Meetings held by P.D. Ouspensky - HolyBooks.com

A Record of Meetings held by P.D. Ouspensky - HolyBooks.com

A Record of Meetings held by P.D. Ouspensky - HolyBooks.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

talks be necessary, why is school necessary? The language will spread<strong>by</strong> itself, maybe in our lifetime, maybe later. But the ideas will enterinto general currency in a wrong form. There will be no distinctionbetween 'doing' and 'happening'. Ideas will be different, only wordswill remain.MRS. A. Are all discussions on philosophical subjects undesirable?MR. O. It depends with whom.MR. P . If a subject crops up in conversation and you feel somethingabout it, you are apt to say what you feel, and that is very likely to becoloured with system ideas. The alternative is to act almost consciouslyand to say something you don't mean at all, which is very difficult. Inpractice one is always carried away, identified.MR. O. I don't see why it is necessary to say something. Why not saynothing? But it is quite right that in practice people are carried away.Our aim, however, is that it should not happen.MRS. C. Did Mr. O. say what our position would be when he publishesfragments?MR. O. Then you will be able to write anything you like about what iswritten in them.MRS. C. He is publishing the book soon, isn't he?MR. O. Oh no, don't worry.MRS. N. Mr. O. said that the breaking <strong>of</strong> rules would be sufficient todestroy the possibility <strong>of</strong> work altogether, and I noticed that in thisconnection he mentioned only two, the rule <strong>of</strong> not talking and the rule<strong>of</strong> not having any association with people <strong>of</strong> the earlier group. Can onetake these as the two major rules, or are there others?MR. O. You speak <strong>of</strong> two rules, and someone else heard three rules,but as a matter <strong>of</strong> fact I spoke about rules and then gave someexamples. In connection with this, some people ask for lists <strong>of</strong> rules;others are satisfied with headings. This is the most formatory method<strong>of</strong> learning rules. You cannot make a catalogue <strong>of</strong> them. There is onlyone method <strong>of</strong> learning rules and this other method explains twothings: how to learn rules and how to think in a new way. Take onerule and try to understand it and study it: what it means, why there isthis rule, etc. Then you will see ramifications <strong>of</strong> this rule. You will seethat it touches certain other things and creates at least one other rule.Then try to understand this other rule, its purpose, etc., and in tryingto do this you will <strong>com</strong>e to a third rule. In this way you <strong>com</strong>e back in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!