13.07.2015 Views

A Record of Meetings held by P.D. Ouspensky - HolyBooks.com

A Record of Meetings held by P.D. Ouspensky - HolyBooks.com

A Record of Meetings held by P.D. Ouspensky - HolyBooks.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

view; at the same time, <strong>by</strong> studying ourselves individually, we establishour own level <strong>of</strong> being. We realize that we are like this and we are likethat, and we have imagination about this and that, and that defines our/ being—it means plurality, not unity. In relation to all <strong>of</strong> us it meanswe are not one, we are many, we cannot 'do', we are asleep, we don'tremember ourselves; these are features <strong>of</strong> our state <strong>of</strong> being. Even ifwe want to we cannot awake because we have so many favouritedreams that immediately these favourite dreams put us to sleep again,even if we awake for a second, and it is very hard work and needs verymany efforts to begin to awake. This is our present level <strong>of</strong> being; weare not collected, we always lose ourselves in everything, that meanswe are identified with everything.Q . What is the practical application <strong>of</strong> this system?MR. O. For instance, a possibility to establish our state <strong>of</strong> consciousnessand possibility <strong>by</strong> self-remembering to increase our consciousness—that immediately be<strong>com</strong>es practical; that is what first struck me when Ibegan to study it, that this is particularly important and particularlyinteresting (because Eastern systems miss this point) that we are notconscious and secondly that we can be<strong>com</strong>e conscious.There were interesting plays and interesting books, but they werevery specialized like [?] or they went under name <strong>of</strong> philosophy,and generally written in such difficult language that they remainedunknown to general public. I thought in the nineteenth century thebest psychologist was [?]—very few people know <strong>of</strong> him.Q . Can this system as a practical application be used <strong>by</strong> doing thingsbetter, or making things better?MR. O. How can you do better if you cannot make at all? No, wecannot start with that, it is not the first step, it is very far, the onlything we can do is to be<strong>com</strong>e more conscious.Q . I must find another word because I do make things which I call'doing'—cannot I do it better?MR. O. No, neither better nor worse, nor for long time. When yourstate <strong>of</strong> consciousness begins to change, when you be<strong>com</strong>e moreconscious than ordinary....Q . Somebody asked a question after you left last time as to whetheryou thought we could build cathedrals.MR. O. It means very much study, because people who came toschool—suppose there are schools which were connected with building

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!