13.07.2015 Views

A Record of Meetings held by P.D. Ouspensky - HolyBooks.com

A Record of Meetings held by P.D. Ouspensky - HolyBooks.com

A Record of Meetings held by P.D. Ouspensky - HolyBooks.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>of</strong> the work may keep one back, but one must go on making efforts,that is all.MR. E. I have found interest in a subject is almost synonymous withidentification—the more interested I be<strong>com</strong>e the more identified Ibe<strong>com</strong>e. This is clearly undesirable yet in a way it appears that thisvery identification gives me the energy and incentive to pursue thesubject or work on it. It is very hard to see what 'interest' can meanwithout identification. Does real interest correspond to some quality <strong>of</strong>essence, if so, I can see that it must be possible to have interest withoutidentification?MR. O. No, it is not the same thing; we will speak about it when youfind this out, only now there is nothing to speak about if you thinkthey are the same thing, but when you find out then there will bematerial for discussion.MR. E. The outer cause <strong>of</strong> anger or annoyance is usually somethingwhich opposes something I want to do. Being identified with my wish,I am unable to resolve these two opposed forces into a third. Theresult <strong>of</strong> this is an insoluble problem which sets up friction making menegative. ...MR. O. No, 'insoluble problem' was used as term; it was something <strong>of</strong>quite a different nature, you cannot use it as just imaginary quantity.MR. H. There are two ways in which I think about the idea <strong>of</strong> unity, <strong>of</strong>permanent 'I'. Either I think, 'If ever I am to approach nearer to somekind <strong>of</strong> unity, this part <strong>of</strong> me will have to be got rid <strong>of</strong>, that part <strong>of</strong> meis harmless, another part <strong>of</strong> me is useful and will have to be retained.'At other times I think, 'All these different sides <strong>of</strong> my nature willremain, but they will be harmonized and subordinated before any kind<strong>of</strong> unity can be reached.' In point <strong>of</strong> fact I don't know how to think <strong>of</strong>the idea <strong>of</strong> permanent 'I' at all. My question is how to do so?MR. O. By realizing your present state first—divided and impermanent;the more you realize the present situation the more you can understandwhat could be opposite to that. We ascribe to ourselves, we areaccustomed to think <strong>of</strong> ourselves as something united and permanent,and these illusions must be broken in us.MR. H. The following incident constantly occurs—I leave the houselost in thought; I shut the front door and am half way down the streetwhen I suddenly think, 'Have I switched <strong>of</strong>f the light?' I go back and Ialmost always find that I have turned <strong>of</strong>f the light. Is it not one <strong>of</strong> the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!