13.07.2015 Views

A Record of Meetings held by P.D. Ouspensky - HolyBooks.com

A Record of Meetings held by P.D. Ouspensky - HolyBooks.com

A Record of Meetings held by P.D. Ouspensky - HolyBooks.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MR. O. No, not higher. You cannot work with higher centres, you see.But it means as many centres as possible working together. As many asyou can collect.MRS. S. Does building a house correspond to routine work in whichwe don't invent?MR. O. That is a question to be answered <strong>by</strong> observation. But returning tothe previous question, about centres. Magic is another triad. If it is reallyintentional, magic means at least a little <strong>of</strong> higher centres. Without, it willbe only accidental, as I said. Then there are things like scientific work, forinstance, or ordinary life work, that can be done with only one centre.MR. M. Is the principal feature <strong>of</strong> criminal activity careful planning?MR. O. I do not know. That is not the way to <strong>com</strong>e to it.MRS. S. Is it right to say that no chance <strong>com</strong>es in at all in the activity<strong>of</strong> work <strong>of</strong> art?MR. O. It is difficult to say what you mean <strong>by</strong> 'chance'. If you can giveme some reasons for what you mean to say, then perhaps it will bepossible to answer.MR. H. What is the real use <strong>of</strong> formatory centre?MR. O. Registering, recording.MISS L. Are all activities starting with first force destructive?MR. O. No.MR. B. Can one think <strong>of</strong> the life <strong>of</strong> a person as an octave?MR. O. Yes, but you cannot find the right scale. It is too difficult.MR. D. Can it be explained how it is that the higher the hydrogen, thequicker the centres work, and yet the bigger the cosmos the slower thetime <strong>of</strong> its mental impression?MR, O. That is one <strong>of</strong> the questions that lack perspective. Slower orquicker, it is only from our point <strong>of</strong> view. In itself it is the same.MR. L. Is it correct to say that if intellectual centre did not interfere theintellectual part <strong>of</strong> moving centre would work?MR. O. No, this is not sufficient. Other things are necessary.MR. L. Is the idea <strong>of</strong> centres given us as a framework?MR. O. How do you mean?MR. L. The idea that came to me was that centres are not watertight<strong>com</strong>partments. . . .MR. O. They are not, but they should be.MR. L. It seemed to me that centres might occupy the whole <strong>of</strong> us atthe same time?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!