13.07.2015 Views

Managing Sticky Situations at Work

Managing Sticky Situations at Work

Managing Sticky Situations at Work

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

176 <strong>Managing</strong> <strong>Sticky</strong> <strong>Situ<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>Work</strong>Before we step back and examine the sticky situ<strong>at</strong>ions th<strong>at</strong> evolvefrom the e-mail explosion, we must look <strong>at</strong> when it is appropri<strong>at</strong>e toe-mail and when another form of communic<strong>at</strong>ion serves us better. Inaddition to examining e-mail in this fashion, we must also considerinstant messages (IM’s), text messaging, and all other forms ofe-communic<strong>at</strong>ion.One of the biggest problems with e-communic<strong>at</strong>ion is the ‘‘send’’button. As soon as you hit th<strong>at</strong> button, you cannot turn back. Furthermore,e-communic<strong>at</strong>ion prevents us from judging a reaction to ourmessage. In Chapter 1 we looked <strong>at</strong> the power of nonverbal communic<strong>at</strong>ion.Via countless nonverbal messages, we pass along our feelingsand the underlying ‘‘intent’’ of the communic<strong>at</strong>ion. When we sayto a colleague, ‘‘Th<strong>at</strong> report really should go to the boss,’’ do wemean it should, meaning the boss needs to get it, but don’t send itfor goodness sakes! Or, do we mean, he should get the report, andyessendit,like,now!Arewejoking?Arewebeingsarcastic?Arewedeeply affected? We cannot convey any of these feelings throughe-communic<strong>at</strong>ion where the risk of misunderstanding skyrockets.Yet, more and more of us are writing notes to colleagues, clients, subordin<strong>at</strong>es,and bosses and expecting those one-way communic<strong>at</strong>ionnotes to convey meaning.How can we take advantage of the amazing convenience ofe-communic<strong>at</strong>ion and avoid the risks of miscommunic<strong>at</strong>ion?CHOOSING THE RIGHT KIND OF COMMUNICATIONWhen we look <strong>at</strong> communic<strong>at</strong>ion of all types, we must evalu<strong>at</strong>e themedium in which we communic<strong>at</strong>e. In the past we had fewer choices,namely face to face, telephone, or written letter. For years people wonderedabout the best time to use each of these media. Clearly, when wehad something urgent to convey or when we wanted to make our messageparticularly personal, we chose a face-to-face interaction. Whenthe message was less personal, we moved down the continuum to telephonecommunic<strong>at</strong>ion and finally to the least personal, the businessletter. After years of struggle, th<strong>at</strong> is, when we sent letters when weshould have called or when we called when we should have communic<strong>at</strong>edin person, we finally figured it out.Today, however, we have many more choices and those sheer numbersadd to the confusion around wh<strong>at</strong> to do and when. For example,a letter no longer seems impersonal. In fact, because we get so few lettersor handwritten notes, we take notice when one comes across our

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!