10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1: The Need for Str<strong>on</strong>g Fiscal Acti<strong>on</strong><br />

In short, we cannot count <strong>on</strong> robust ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth al<strong>on</strong>e to resolve our difficult<br />

fiscal challenges.<br />

Ontario’s three per cent increase in real GDP in 2010 reflected its recovery from <strong>the</strong> recessi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2011 Budget, private-sector forecasters were predicting an average <strong>of</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

2.7 per cent real annual growth in <strong>the</strong> four years from 2011 to 2014; <strong>the</strong> government scaled<br />

this back to 2.6 per cent for planning purposes. By November, <strong>the</strong> private-sector forecast<br />

average for this period had fallen to 2.3 per cent and <strong>the</strong> government, in its 2011 Ontario<br />

Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Outlook and Fiscal Review, reduced this to 2.2 per cent for planning purposes.<br />

Few forecasters have looked out to 2018, <strong>the</strong> period covered in <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commissi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s mandate.<br />

We accept <strong>the</strong> government’s planning assumpti<strong>on</strong>s for ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth out to 2014 from<br />

<strong>the</strong> 2011 Ontario Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Outlook and Fiscal Review, but bey<strong>on</strong>d that, we take a cautious<br />

approach — <strong>on</strong>e dictated by our view <strong>of</strong> Ontario’s ec<strong>on</strong>omic capacity and its ability to grow.<br />

No matter how much demand exists for Ontario’s goods and services, <strong>the</strong>re is a limit to <strong>the</strong><br />

level and growth rate <strong>of</strong> its potential output, both to what <strong>the</strong> province can produce and how<br />

fast its ec<strong>on</strong>omy can grow without causing rising inflati<strong>on</strong>. If an ec<strong>on</strong>omy is already running at<br />

full capacity (or potential), <strong>the</strong>re are limits to <strong>the</strong> speed at which it can c<strong>on</strong>tinue to expand in<br />

<strong>the</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g term. A recessi<strong>on</strong> reduces actual output below potential, and, during <strong>the</strong> recovery<br />

period, <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omy can exceed <strong>the</strong> speed limit and grow rapidly until its actual output returns<br />

to full capacity. After that, <strong>the</strong> growth rate must fall back to <strong>the</strong> slower pace that keeps inflati<strong>on</strong><br />

in check.<br />

There is no firm measure <strong>of</strong> Ontario’s potential l<strong>on</strong>g-term real growth rate, but most estimates<br />

centre around two per cent annually, recognizing that <strong>the</strong> actual figure could be half a<br />

percentage point larger or smaller. Such variati<strong>on</strong>s can quickly accumulate to large<br />

differences. An ec<strong>on</strong>omy growing at 1.5 per cent annually expands by 6.1 per cent over<br />

four years; at 2.5 per cent annual growth, <strong>the</strong> four-year expansi<strong>on</strong> is 10.4 per cent.<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!