10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Executive Summary<br />

� Accountability for labour relati<strong>on</strong>s and service delivery should be appropriately distributed.<br />

Governments, BPS employers and bargaining agents should bear resp<strong>on</strong>sibility for<br />

bargaining outcomes. All BPS management and employees should bear resp<strong>on</strong>sibility<br />

for delivering high-quality public services and value for public m<strong>on</strong>ey; and<br />

� Broader system changes should be part <strong>of</strong> a larger visi<strong>on</strong>, in which labour relati<strong>on</strong>s plays a<br />

part, but is not an end in and <strong>of</strong> itself.<br />

These principles should be applied to a number <strong>of</strong> key issues that recur in labour-management<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> public sector.<br />

The goal <strong>of</strong> balance means <strong>the</strong> government should settle <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> essential services and<br />

change <strong>the</strong> interest arbitrati<strong>on</strong> system. An independent working group should determine which<br />

services are essential and how disputes should be resolved. The interest arbitrati<strong>on</strong> system<br />

has come under increasing scrutiny and attack. We do not find <strong>the</strong> system to be broken,<br />

though it can be improved. Arbitrators are likely to follow <strong>the</strong> lead <strong>of</strong> public-sector employers<br />

adopting tough, but fair, stances in negotiati<strong>on</strong>s. Am<strong>on</strong>g changes that would help:<br />

an independent tribunal or commissi<strong>on</strong> should manage a panel or roster <strong>of</strong> independent<br />

arbitrators, set time limits for each arbitrati<strong>on</strong> and require arbitrators to provide clear<br />

reas<strong>on</strong>s for <strong>the</strong>ir decisi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Ensuring that public services are delivered more effectively and efficiently is primarily a<br />

management problem. Most BPS workers are well educated, highly competent and dedicated,<br />

but <strong>the</strong> system does not measure productivity well, nor does it encourage active steps to<br />

improve it. This can and must change. The government should provide a zero budget increase<br />

for wage costs; ministries and agencies will <strong>the</strong>n have to drive out inefficiencies to absorb any<br />

wage increase. Bumping provisi<strong>on</strong>s unduly impede <strong>the</strong> move towards a progressive and<br />

efficient public service; <strong>the</strong>se should be modified. C<strong>on</strong>cerns about successor rights should not<br />

stop privatizati<strong>on</strong>s or amalgamati<strong>on</strong>s; inherited agreements do not live forever. The Ontario<br />

Labour Relati<strong>on</strong>s Board should be given expanded authority to encourage bargaining<br />

structures that support <strong>the</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> quality and effective public services. The government<br />

should also encourage fur<strong>the</strong>r rati<strong>on</strong>alizati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> BPS bargaining. The province should move to<br />

a smaller number <strong>of</strong> bargaining units and more centralized bargaining. The government should<br />

set up a labour relati<strong>on</strong>s informati<strong>on</strong> bureau to collect data relevant to employers and uni<strong>on</strong>s,<br />

especially measures <strong>of</strong> productivity.<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!