10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1: The Need for Str<strong>on</strong>g Fiscal Acti<strong>on</strong><br />

This trajectory is our Status Quo outlook for program spending: it incorporates <strong>the</strong> increases<br />

that are likely to take place if current programs are retained in <strong>the</strong>ir current form, if no new<br />

programs are introduced, and if nothing fur<strong>the</strong>r is d<strong>on</strong>e to restrain spending. This Status<br />

Quo outlook is not just a mechanistic extensi<strong>on</strong> into <strong>the</strong> future <strong>of</strong> past trends in total program<br />

spending. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, it is based <strong>on</strong> what are called <strong>the</strong> drivers <strong>of</strong> spending growth — <strong>the</strong> forces<br />

that determine how much <strong>the</strong> government would have to spend in <strong>the</strong> future to maintain<br />

current services. Two <strong>of</strong> those drivers — inflati<strong>on</strong> and populati<strong>on</strong> growth — are comm<strong>on</strong> to<br />

many programs, but most programs have <strong>the</strong>ir own additi<strong>on</strong>al unique pressures that drive<br />

up costs.<br />

Four blocks <strong>of</strong> spending accounted for over 77 per cent <strong>of</strong> all program expenses in 2010–11:<br />

health; educati<strong>on</strong> (kindergarten through Grade 12); children’s and social services; and postsec<strong>on</strong>dary<br />

educati<strong>on</strong>. Left <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own, <strong>the</strong>y would approach 83 per cent <strong>of</strong> program spending<br />

in 2017–18. These programs will command ever-growing shares, squeezing out spending <strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> government’s o<strong>the</strong>r programs — justice, transportati<strong>on</strong>, ec<strong>on</strong>omic development, tourism,<br />

agriculture, natural resources and o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

Here is how some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost drivers work in those four major areas <strong>of</strong> government spending.<br />

Health care expenses accounted for 40.3 per cent <strong>of</strong> program spending in 2010–11 —<br />

$44.8 billi<strong>on</strong> out <strong>of</strong> $111.2 billi<strong>on</strong> spent <strong>on</strong> programs. A c<strong>on</strong>tinuati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> current practices would<br />

require <strong>the</strong> province to increase spending <strong>on</strong> health care by an average <strong>of</strong> 4.7 per cent<br />

annually through 2013–14 and 5.0 per cent annually from <strong>the</strong>n until 2017–18, when it would<br />

reach $62.5 billi<strong>on</strong>. A look at <strong>the</strong> drivers in <strong>the</strong> three biggest comp<strong>on</strong>ents <strong>of</strong> health care<br />

funding shows why.<br />

The cost <strong>of</strong> running hospitals, <strong>the</strong> single biggest item in <strong>the</strong> overall health care budget at<br />

$15.5 billi<strong>on</strong> in 2010–11, is driven primarily by three factors — inflati<strong>on</strong>, populati<strong>on</strong> growth<br />

and aging (older people need hospitals more than younger people). Populati<strong>on</strong> growth will<br />

add 1.2 per cent to costs each year through <strong>the</strong> whole period to 2017–18 and aging ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

1 per cent. Inflati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> rising cost <strong>of</strong> buying <strong>the</strong> goods and services needed to operate<br />

hospitals, is expected to add 3.0 per cent to costs this year and about ano<strong>the</strong>r 2.0 per cent in<br />

<strong>the</strong> next four years. Most <strong>of</strong> what hospitals buy are <strong>the</strong> services <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir employees, so <strong>the</strong><br />

inflati<strong>on</strong> driver is primarily <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> compensati<strong>on</strong> — wages, salaries and benefits. Whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

hospitals can hold this 2.0 per cent line <strong>on</strong> inflati<strong>on</strong> over such a l<strong>on</strong>g period is open to<br />

questi<strong>on</strong>. Note, however, that populati<strong>on</strong> aging — which in much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public debate has<br />

become <strong>the</strong> major “source” <strong>of</strong> future cost pressures — accounts for less than a quarter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

cost drivers for hospital spending. All told, hospital spending in our Status Quo Scenario would<br />

rise by an average <strong>of</strong> 4.1 per cent annually over seven years to $20.5 billi<strong>on</strong> in 2017–18.<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!