10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Revenue from pers<strong>on</strong>al income taxes grew by <strong>on</strong>ly 26.2 per cent between 1993–94 and<br />

1999–2000, an extremely weak showing given <strong>the</strong> 39.4 per cent rise in <strong>the</strong> underlying nominal<br />

GDP during that period, but <strong>the</strong>re was a reas<strong>on</strong> for this. Tax revenues tend to be highly elastic<br />

during a period <strong>of</strong> str<strong>on</strong>g ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth following a recessi<strong>on</strong>; that is, tax revenues typically<br />

grow faster than GDP if tax rates are left unchanged. But over <strong>the</strong> 1995 to 1999 period,<br />

pers<strong>on</strong>al income tax rates were reduced sharply. However, retail sales tax revenue increased<br />

by 55.3 per cent and takings from corporate income taxes more than doubled. Two o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

revenue sources displayed str<strong>on</strong>g growth. Revenue from government enterprises rose briskly,<br />

primarily because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expanding lottery and gaming businesses; so did o<strong>the</strong>r forms <strong>of</strong><br />

revenue, largely as a result <strong>of</strong> increased revenues to <strong>the</strong> province from municipalities.<br />

The government <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day transferred a number <strong>of</strong> programs to municipalities, but during a<br />

transiti<strong>on</strong> period, <strong>the</strong> municipalities reimbursed <strong>the</strong> province for services it was still providing<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir behalf.<br />

Relative to <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> provincial ec<strong>on</strong>omy, own-source revenues in 1999–2000 were<br />

15.9 per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP. In 2010–11, <strong>the</strong> own-source revenue share was even lower ––<br />

13.65 per cent. Since <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commissi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s Status Quo Scenario for <strong>the</strong> next seven years<br />

assumes that revenues will grow more slowly than <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omy as a whole, this share will<br />

decline fur<strong>the</strong>r, to <strong>on</strong>ly 13.09 per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP, in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> any measures to increase<br />

revenue. In Chapter 1, The Need for Str<strong>on</strong>g Fiscal Acti<strong>on</strong>, we recommended a series <strong>of</strong><br />

revenue measures worth almost $2 billi<strong>on</strong> by 2017–18; <strong>the</strong>se steps, involving c<strong>on</strong>traband<br />

tobacco, <strong>the</strong> underground ec<strong>on</strong>omy, collecti<strong>on</strong>s issues, tax expenditures and additi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

revenues from Crown agencies, would raise <strong>the</strong> share to 13.33 per cent by that year. Federal<br />

transfers related to <strong>the</strong> recent ec<strong>on</strong>omic stimulus package and transiti<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> HST will fall <strong>of</strong>f<br />

over <strong>the</strong> next few years; all told, transfers are expected to amount to 3.3 per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP by<br />

2017–18, down from 3.8 per cent in 2010–11.<br />

Matching spending to revenues by 2017–18 –– <strong>the</strong> target set out in <strong>the</strong> 2011 Budget –– was<br />

never going to be easy. Even so, <strong>the</strong> Budget clearly signalled <strong>the</strong> need for <strong>the</strong> provincial<br />

government to restrain spending in <strong>the</strong> seven years to 2017–18. Its scenario for <strong>the</strong> target year<br />

put program spending at $124.9 billi<strong>on</strong>; with its projecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> $142.2 billi<strong>on</strong> in revenue,<br />

$16.3 billi<strong>on</strong> in interest costs and a $1 billi<strong>on</strong> reserve, <strong>the</strong> budget would be in balance.<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!