10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 1: The Need for Str<strong>on</strong>g Fiscal Acti<strong>on</strong><br />

The 3.8 per cent annual cut to “everything else” would be almost impossible to manage.<br />

The prospect <strong>of</strong> squeezing more each year would force ministries to simply chop an activity<br />

altoge<strong>the</strong>r or impose <strong>the</strong> 24 per cent cut all at <strong>on</strong>ce and <strong>the</strong>n sort out <strong>the</strong> future with a budget<br />

fixed at <strong>the</strong> new lower level. In some cases, such cuts would border <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> technically<br />

infeasible or require decisi<strong>on</strong>s that could be counterproductive. For example, a substantial<br />

porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “everything else” category c<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> amortizing existing capital<br />

(mainly infrastructure projects), <strong>the</strong> government’s c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s to existing pensi<strong>on</strong><br />

arrangements with public-sector employees and <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> electricity c<strong>on</strong>tracts. These items,<br />

which in 2017–18 will account for over 31 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “everything else” spending, cannot<br />

be cut. This implies that <strong>the</strong> cut to everything o<strong>the</strong>r than those fixed items would be in <strong>the</strong><br />

order <strong>of</strong> 6.4 per cent annually, for a cumulative decline <strong>of</strong> more than 37 per cent over<br />

seven years.<br />

Also included here are cost-sharing programs with <strong>the</strong> federal government, so if <strong>the</strong> province<br />

cut $100 milli<strong>on</strong> from programs in which <strong>the</strong> federal–provincial cost split is 60–40, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

Ottawa’s c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> would fall by $150 milli<strong>on</strong> and total spending in <strong>the</strong> province would be cut<br />

by $250 milli<strong>on</strong>. Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> burden <strong>of</strong> restraint will fall even more heavily <strong>on</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

programs.<br />

This is a simple illustrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> choices Ontarians must face in <strong>the</strong> m<strong>on</strong>ths ahead.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r choice involves labour compensati<strong>on</strong>. Since <strong>the</strong> total bill for wages, salaries and<br />

benefits accounts for about half <strong>of</strong> all program spending, it is difficult to believe that program<br />

spending can be held to annual growth <strong>of</strong> 0.8 per cent if labour costs rise by much more<br />

than that.<br />

Having developed a number <strong>of</strong> scenarios for program spending, we have opted to recommend<br />

<strong>on</strong>e that seeks even greater savings from health care to leave room for additi<strong>on</strong>al growth in<br />

spending <strong>on</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r programs. As we will spell out in detail in Chapter 5, Health, we believe<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is ample scope in <strong>the</strong> health care system for efficiencies that will allow health care<br />

providers to deliver <strong>the</strong> services Ontarians need without getting annual increases <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kind<br />

seen in recent years.<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!