10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Move towards full cost recovery and user-pay models<br />

The government’s envir<strong>on</strong>mental programs are not all run <strong>on</strong> a full cost recovery basis and<br />

existing fees do not keep pace with <strong>the</strong> rising costs <strong>of</strong> program delivery. Where <strong>the</strong> opportunity<br />

exists and where <strong>the</strong> beneficiary can be identified, <strong>the</strong> cost burden <strong>of</strong> providing <strong>the</strong>se services<br />

should be placed <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> beneficiary’s shoulders ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> public’s.<br />

For example, <strong>the</strong> government spends about $15 milli<strong>on</strong> per year through multiple ministries to<br />

manage water quantity and encourage its efficient use. In Ontario, any<strong>on</strong>e who takes more<br />

than 50,000 litres <strong>of</strong> water per day from a lake, river, stream or groundwater source must<br />

obtain a Permit to Take Water from MOE. A permit will not be issued if <strong>the</strong> proposed watertaking<br />

will adversely affect existing users or <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment. The cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> permit ranges<br />

from $750 to $3,000, but yields too little annual revenue to <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program. 2<br />

More costs could be recovered if <strong>the</strong> commercial and industrial water users who create <strong>the</strong><br />

need for water management programs pay for <strong>the</strong>ir use <strong>of</strong> water. The charge would also<br />

create a financial incentive for companies to use water more efficiently.<br />

Phase 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Water Taking Charges Program, launched in April 2007, established a charge<br />

<strong>of</strong> $3.71 for every milli<strong>on</strong> litres <strong>of</strong> water taken by high-c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> industrial and commercial<br />

users. Facilities in this category (under <strong>the</strong> regulati<strong>on</strong>s) include beverage producers,<br />

canning/pickling facilities and c<strong>on</strong>crete manufacturers. 3<br />

Phase 2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program would expand <strong>the</strong> charge to include medium-c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong><br />

(e.g., mining, c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, textile, wood producti<strong>on</strong>, metal producti<strong>on</strong> and recreati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

facilities) and low-c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> (e.g., electric power generati<strong>on</strong>) users. 4 This could increase<br />

annual revenue to almost $6 milli<strong>on</strong>, with minimal incremental costs to government,<br />

and would recover about 40 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> government’s direct costs <strong>on</strong> water quantity<br />

management programs.<br />

2 “Permits to Take Water,” Nov. 16, 2010, downloaded from<br />

http://www.ene.gov.<strong>on</strong>.ca/envir<strong>on</strong>ment/en/industry/assessment_and_approvals/water_taking/STDPROD_075554.html.<br />

3 “Stewardship, Leadership, Accountability: Safeguarding and Sustaining Ontario’s Water Resources for Future Generati<strong>on</strong>s,” Proposal<br />

Paper, Summer 2009, p. 40.<br />

4 Ibid.<br />

336

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!