10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 12: Infrastructure, Real Estate and Electricity<br />

While we understand that <strong>the</strong> government initiated <strong>the</strong> OCEB to help with <strong>the</strong> transiti<strong>on</strong> to<br />

higher prices associated with <strong>the</strong> shift to cleaner energy supply, <strong>the</strong> program distorts true cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> electricity and discourages c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong>. In additi<strong>on</strong>, we foresee that <strong>the</strong> sudden end to<br />

such a generous incentive will be difficult if c<strong>on</strong>cluded as planned <strong>on</strong> Dec. 31, 2015, as it will<br />

create a c<strong>on</strong>siderable price shock to ratepayers. We are wary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> possibility that <strong>the</strong> OCEB<br />

would remain <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> provincial treasury and thus risk Ontario’s ability to return to a balanced<br />

budget in 2017–18. This is fur<strong>the</strong>r complicated by <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> OEFC is not guaranteeing<br />

that <strong>the</strong> Debt Retirement Charge (DRC) will be removed in lock-step with <strong>the</strong> OCEB,<br />

suggesting this may not happen until as far out as 2018. 15 Any s<strong>of</strong>t landing provided by<br />

removing <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> DRC simultaneously with <strong>the</strong> expiry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> OCEB would evaporate if<br />

such a delay were to occur.<br />

Finally, <strong>the</strong> opportunity costs associated with <strong>the</strong> OCEB are substantial. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commissi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

str<strong>on</strong>gly believes <strong>the</strong>re are more effective uses for <strong>the</strong> over $1 billi<strong>on</strong> per year spent <strong>on</strong> this<br />

initiative. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commissi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> would be satisfied with a gradual phase-out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> OCEB. However,<br />

a more aggressive timeline or an immediate cease to <strong>the</strong> program would be welcomed.<br />

Recommendati<strong>on</strong> 12-10: Eliminate <strong>the</strong> Ontario Clean Energy Benefit as quickly as possible.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> OCEB is <strong>the</strong> largest electricity rate subsidy in Ontario, it is not <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> programs target specific customer types (e.g., small or large volume) or certain<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> province. Each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se initiatives may <strong>of</strong>fer relief to c<strong>on</strong>sumers in terms <strong>of</strong> energy<br />

costs (electricity, gas, oil, diesel, etc.), but over time could discourage c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong>, leading to<br />

higher costs, and should periodically be revisited to ensure <strong>the</strong>y are meeting policy goals and<br />

represent value for m<strong>on</strong>ey.<br />

Recommendati<strong>on</strong> 12-11: Review all o<strong>the</strong>r energy subsidy programs against measures <strong>of</strong><br />

value for m<strong>on</strong>ey and achievement <strong>of</strong> specific policy goals.<br />

15 Ontario Electricity Financial Corporati<strong>on</strong>, 2011 Annual Report, p. 2.<br />

329

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!