10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

� L<strong>on</strong>g-term health costs outstripping federal funding: The CHT and <strong>the</strong> Wait Times<br />

64<br />

Reducti<strong>on</strong> Fund are set to expire in 2014. The federal government plans to increase <strong>the</strong><br />

CHT by its current six per cent per year until 2017, but <strong>the</strong>n tie <strong>the</strong> growth rate to Canada’s<br />

nominal GDP, with a three per cent floor. While we recommend capping <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong><br />

Ontario health spending below that level to balance <strong>the</strong> budget by 2017–18, <strong>the</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g-run<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> health care will almost certainly grow faster than nominal GDP. Moving to a<br />

GDP-based growth rate would cost Ontario about $239 milli<strong>on</strong> in 2017–18, but could<br />

reach nearly $421 milli<strong>on</strong> if GDP growth is below three per cent. These gaps will grow.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>straining CHT transfers in this fashi<strong>on</strong> will reduce even fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> federal<br />

government’s minority share <strong>of</strong> health care funding.<br />

Aside from <strong>the</strong> major transfers (CHT, Canada Social Transfer [CST] and Equalizati<strong>on</strong>),<br />

<strong>the</strong> federal government has made no commitment to renewing o<strong>the</strong>r expiring transfers.<br />

Ontario needs a reliable and predictable federal partner.<br />

Some federal programs that directly serve Ontarians or fiscal arrangements that support<br />

provincial services should be modernized and reformed. The province should advocate<br />

str<strong>on</strong>gly to change federal programs that do not work effectively in Ontario’s interests.<br />

(Full recommendati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>se points can be found in <strong>the</strong> individual chapters.)<br />

Equalizati<strong>on</strong>: A ceiling <strong>on</strong> Equalizati<strong>on</strong> limits <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program to <strong>the</strong> nominal growth<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al GDP despite rising disparities am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> provinces. The program fails to fully<br />

capture and share <strong>the</strong> wealth generated by high commodity prices in o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong> Canada.<br />

Nor does <strong>the</strong> program account for Ontario’s higher cost pressures, which affect <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong><br />

public services. Equalizati<strong>on</strong> should fully capture resource revenues and accommodate<br />

differing price levels am<strong>on</strong>g provinces.<br />

Canada Social Transfer: The federal government generates revenues from Ontario <strong>on</strong> a<br />

nearly equal per capita basis; <strong>the</strong> CST <strong>the</strong>n returns m<strong>on</strong>ey to <strong>the</strong> province <strong>on</strong> an equal per<br />

capita basis. This unnecessary step is inefficient and reduces accountability and transparency.<br />

The CST should be transferred to <strong>the</strong> provinces in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> tax points; in o<strong>the</strong>r words,<br />

<strong>the</strong> federal government should reduce its taxes so provinces could increase <strong>the</strong>irs by an<br />

equivalent, revenue-neutral amount.<br />

Employment Insurance: Employment Insurance does not meet <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> modern<br />

labour market. In 2010, Ontarians c<strong>on</strong>tributed about 40 per cent <strong>of</strong> EI premiums, yet received<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly 32 per cent <strong>of</strong> benefits. And despite having an unemployment rate above <strong>the</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

average, <strong>on</strong>ly 32 per cent <strong>of</strong> unemployed Ontarians get EI, which also restricts <strong>the</strong>ir eligibility<br />

for training. The changes recommended by <strong>the</strong> Mowat Centre for Policy Innovati<strong>on</strong> would<br />

improve outcomes for Ontario workers and employers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!