10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In <strong>the</strong> meantime, <strong>the</strong> ODB should be better targeted. Two basic opti<strong>on</strong>s are <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> table, each<br />

with differing effects <strong>on</strong> who would benefit and <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> savings that can be achieved.<br />

A minimal step would be to make <strong>the</strong> porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> pharmaceutical costs paid for by seniors rise<br />

more sharply as income increases. The o<strong>the</strong>r, preferred, opti<strong>on</strong> is to sever <strong>the</strong> link to age and<br />

instead link <strong>the</strong> benefit to income <strong>on</strong>ly. In ei<strong>the</strong>r case, changes would need to be phased in<br />

over time.<br />

Opti<strong>on</strong> 1, which <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commissi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> views as de minimus, is to change <strong>the</strong> program <strong>on</strong>ly as it<br />

applies to seniors. That change would see <strong>the</strong> tightening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relati<strong>on</strong>ship to income. In o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

words, co-payments would increase more sharply, and in a more graduated fashi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

as income rises. This opti<strong>on</strong> would permit substantial savings. Out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> $2.7 billi<strong>on</strong> now<br />

spent within <strong>the</strong> ODB program <strong>on</strong> subsidizing pharmaceuticals for seniors, at least<br />

$300 milli<strong>on</strong> could be saved annually. Tightening <strong>the</strong> relati<strong>on</strong>ship fur<strong>the</strong>r, it is feasible to<br />

save as much as $1 billi<strong>on</strong> per year. In that scenario, <strong>the</strong> highest-income seniors would see<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir annual co-payments increase around $1,000 per year.<br />

Opti<strong>on</strong> 2, and <strong>the</strong> preferred route forward for <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commissi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>, is to change <strong>the</strong> program as<br />

it applies to both seniors and lower-income n<strong>on</strong>-seniors. In this opti<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> links to age and<br />

social assistance status would end. Instead, <strong>the</strong> program would be linked solely to income.<br />

So an individual or family would have <strong>the</strong> same eligibility and extent <strong>of</strong> assistance with <strong>the</strong><br />

cost <strong>of</strong> pharmaceuticals regardless <strong>of</strong> age or whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are receiving social assistance.<br />

This opti<strong>on</strong> would greatly streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> equity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program. It would also remove a large<br />

brick in <strong>the</strong> so-called “welfare wall.”<br />

What is <strong>the</strong> “welfare wall”? It is a series <strong>of</strong> barriers that can discourage people from leaving<br />

social assistance. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ODB, after a short interval social assistance recipients<br />

through Ontario Works and <strong>the</strong> Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) lose access to<br />

pharmaceutical cost support if <strong>the</strong>y take a job. This is a major c<strong>on</strong>tributor to what is known as<br />

<strong>the</strong> high marginal tax rate faced by social assistance recipients entering <strong>the</strong> workplace (more<br />

informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> barriers in <strong>the</strong> current social support system can be found in Chapter 8, Social<br />

Programs). Put simply, it serves as a disincentive to finding employment. Making <strong>the</strong> ODB<br />

available to all within a low-income range would remove this disincentive.<br />

However, it would be more difficult under this scenario to extract <strong>the</strong> large savings feasible<br />

under Opti<strong>on</strong> 1. That is because <strong>the</strong>re would be new recipients that would become eligible —<br />

lower-income n<strong>on</strong>-seniors who are not receiving Ontario Works or ODSP — and this would<br />

<strong>of</strong>fset much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> savings from no l<strong>on</strong>ger subsidizing pharmaceuticals for higher-income<br />

seniors.<br />

196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!