10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ontario’s role as a laggard in public spending was highlighted in a 2011 report 11 from <strong>the</strong><br />

Ontario Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce that included <strong>the</strong> following comparis<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

� Ontario had 633 nurses per 100,000 <strong>of</strong> populati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d lowest in Canada,<br />

and well below <strong>the</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al average <strong>of</strong> 789;<br />

� Ontario had 930 residential care beds for seniors per 100,000 <strong>of</strong> populati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> third<br />

lowest in Canada, though just above <strong>the</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al average <strong>of</strong> 916;<br />

� Ontario undergraduate university students paid $5,643 in tuiti<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d highest<br />

in <strong>the</strong> country, and significantly above <strong>the</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al average <strong>of</strong> $4,634; and<br />

� Only 19.6 per cent <strong>of</strong> Ontario children had access to regulated daycare spaces,<br />

compared with 20.3 per cent nati<strong>on</strong>ally. Ontario ranked sixth in Canada.<br />

These are narrow measures and, unlike <strong>the</strong> Financial Management System data, do not take<br />

in <strong>the</strong> breadth <strong>of</strong> all spending <strong>on</strong> health, educati<strong>on</strong> and social services. But in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

cases, <strong>the</strong> provinces <strong>of</strong>fering <strong>the</strong>ir citizens a better, or cheaper, service are am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

traditi<strong>on</strong>ally “have-not” provinces that receive substantial federal transfers.<br />

Although Ontario is now receiving Equalizati<strong>on</strong> payments, <strong>the</strong> fact remains that <strong>the</strong> federal<br />

government takes a larger share <strong>of</strong> its revenues from Ontario than Ontario’s populati<strong>on</strong> share<br />

and devotes a smaller share <strong>of</strong> its spending to Ontario than Ontario’s populati<strong>on</strong> share.<br />

(See Chapter 20, Intergovernmental Relati<strong>on</strong>s.) As a rule, whenever <strong>the</strong> federal government’s<br />

budget is balanced or in surplus, it takes more from Ontario in taxes than it provides in <strong>the</strong> way<br />

<strong>of</strong> federal services to <strong>the</strong> province and in transfers both to Ontarians and to <strong>the</strong>ir provincial<br />

government. From 1997 through 2007 inclusive, <strong>the</strong> years in which <strong>the</strong> federal government ran<br />

a surplus (<strong>on</strong> a nati<strong>on</strong>al accounts basis), Ontario’s net c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> averaged 4.6 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />

GDP, a figure exceeded <strong>on</strong>ly by Alberta’s 5.6 per cent.<br />

11 David MacKinn<strong>on</strong>, “Dollars and Sense, A Case for Modernizing Canada’s Transfer Agreements,” a report prepared for <strong>the</strong> Ontario<br />

Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce, February 2011.<br />

120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!