10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

There are fur<strong>the</strong>r complicati<strong>on</strong>s. Persistently high commodity prices in recent years have<br />

not <strong>on</strong>ly c<strong>on</strong>tributed to str<strong>on</strong>g ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth in Alberta and Saskatchewan, but also to<br />

<strong>the</strong> relatively slower ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth in Ontario; <strong>the</strong>y c<strong>on</strong>tributed to an inflated Canadian<br />

dollar, making Ontario goods and services more costly in global markets. The deep recessi<strong>on</strong><br />

and underwhelming recovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. ec<strong>on</strong>omy were also key reas<strong>on</strong>s for <strong>the</strong> downturn <strong>of</strong><br />

Ontario’s fortunes. Toge<strong>the</strong>r with changes to <strong>the</strong> Equalizati<strong>on</strong> formula, <strong>the</strong>se factors<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tributed to Ontario becoming an Equalizati<strong>on</strong>-receiving province in 2009–10.<br />

Even though Ontario receives Equalizati<strong>on</strong>, Ontarians c<strong>on</strong>tinue to c<strong>on</strong>tribute more to <strong>the</strong><br />

program than <strong>the</strong>y receive in return. This highlights a problem with <strong>the</strong> arrangements in <strong>the</strong><br />

federati<strong>on</strong> — federal transfers disproporti<strong>on</strong>ately benefit o<strong>the</strong>r provinces, at a cost to<br />

Ontarians. For instance, Ontario is fifth am<strong>on</strong>g provinces in ability to raise revenues, 4 but falls<br />

to near last after federal transfers are included — above <strong>on</strong>ly Prince Edward Island.<br />

454<br />

Per Capita ($)<br />

Per Capita ($)<br />

CHART 20.4 Ontario’s Fiscal Capacity is 5th in 2011–12,<br />

But Federal Transfers Bring Ontario to 9th<br />

Per Capita Fiscal Capacities<br />

Before Transfers<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

Provincial Average<br />

N<strong>on</strong>-Resources Resources at 100% Federal Transfers<br />

AB NL SK BC ON QC NS MB NB PEI<br />

Per Capita Fiscal Capacities<br />

After Transfers<br />

Provincial Average<br />

4,000<br />

AB NL SK BC NB NS MB QC ON PE<br />

Notes: Calculati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> fiscal capacity is for <strong>the</strong> 2011–12 entitlement year for <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> Equalizati<strong>on</strong>. The fiscal capacity data is a weighted average <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> 2007–08, 2008–09, 2009–10 fiscal years, using 2011–12 populati<strong>on</strong> figures to determine per capita values. Calculated using 100 per cent natural<br />

resource inclusi<strong>on</strong>. Transfers include 2011–12 entitlements for <strong>the</strong> Canada Health Transfer, Canada Social Transfer, Equalizati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>of</strong>fshore accords and<br />

protecti<strong>on</strong> payments.<br />

Source: Ontario Finance calculati<strong>on</strong>s based <strong>on</strong> data from Finance Canada.<br />

4 The ability to raise revenue, generally termed as fiscal capacity, refers to <strong>the</strong> potential revenue a province could raise if it taxed at nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

average tax rates.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!