10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5: Health<br />

In Ontario, a few simple messages emerge from <strong>the</strong> polling results that do seem robust:<br />

Ontarians regard health care as <strong>the</strong> single most important public policy issue; <strong>the</strong>y are wedded<br />

to <strong>the</strong> single, public payer model; and <strong>the</strong>y will not tolerate anything that causes deteriorati<strong>on</strong><br />

in access and quality <strong>of</strong> care. Also, <strong>the</strong>re now seems to be less c<strong>on</strong>cern that all services be<br />

delivered under public administrati<strong>on</strong>, as l<strong>on</strong>g as <strong>the</strong> bill can be covered by an OHIP card.<br />

Clearly, Ontarians want <strong>the</strong>ir health care system not <strong>on</strong>ly sustained, but also improved. Can<br />

fears <strong>of</strong> unsustainability — that <strong>the</strong> system will not remain affordable — be eased by proposing<br />

some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more obvious — or at least most <strong>of</strong>ten cited — soluti<strong>on</strong>s? Again, unfortunately,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is no straightforward resp<strong>on</strong>se. Sustainability involves many moving parts; any number<br />

<strong>of</strong> changes to <strong>the</strong> equati<strong>on</strong> can render health care more sustainable or less so. Three <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

moving parts come to mind:<br />

� First, str<strong>on</strong>ger productivity growth, by generating more ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth, would make it<br />

easier to afford more health care spending. But even if productivity growth doubled from its<br />

low levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> past decade, trend growth in nominal GDP would still fall far short <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

projected increases in health care spending. In any case, such an aggressive assumpti<strong>on</strong><br />

about productivity growth is mere wishful thinking since we have no ready answers <strong>on</strong> how<br />

to revive it. Wishful thinking, needless to say, cannot be <strong>the</strong> foundati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a policy<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>se to <strong>the</strong> sustainability issue.<br />

� Sec<strong>on</strong>d, we could afford more health care if we raised taxes, but tax rates would have to<br />

rise persistently to keep <strong>the</strong> new revenue received above income growth. This might<br />

generate voter tax fatigue and would inevitably result in broader ec<strong>on</strong>omic losses as <strong>the</strong><br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omic distorti<strong>on</strong>s induced by rising taxes magnified.<br />

� Third, we could restrain all o<strong>the</strong>r government spending severely to leave more room for<br />

health care. But as TD Ec<strong>on</strong>omics pointed out, status quo trends suggest that by 2030,<br />

health care would account for 80 per cent <strong>of</strong> Ontario’s program spending. The remaining<br />

20 per cent would not even cover <strong>the</strong> current educati<strong>on</strong> system, let al<strong>on</strong>e any o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

public services.<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!