10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 11: Business Support<br />

The productivity lens should also be applied when using subsidies to attract foreign business<br />

investment to Ontario. Some flexibility will be needed, as <strong>the</strong>re may be opportunities where<br />

government support can attract a substantial anchor investment to <strong>the</strong> province. Such acti<strong>on</strong>,<br />

however, should be reserved for excepti<strong>on</strong>al or extraordinary cases. In <strong>the</strong> global c<strong>on</strong>text,<br />

especially as developing ec<strong>on</strong>omies ramp up <strong>the</strong>ir business investments, Ontario must<br />

collaborate nati<strong>on</strong>ally and build internati<strong>on</strong>al bridges to be competitive. Efforts should c<strong>on</strong>tinue<br />

to strategically target internati<strong>on</strong>al investment based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> province’s potential to<br />

improve productivity.<br />

Similarly, fur<strong>the</strong>r c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> needs to be given to whe<strong>the</strong>r a productivity focus should apply<br />

across all industries or if it needs to be fine-tuned to specific industry sectors. Our preference<br />

is for a more broad-based approach.<br />

Recommendati<strong>on</strong> 11-3: Refocus <strong>the</strong> mandate <strong>of</strong> business support programs from job<br />

creati<strong>on</strong> to productivity growth in <strong>the</strong> private sector.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>solidate Funding<br />

To develop new and better business support programs, <strong>the</strong> government must change <strong>the</strong><br />

process by which ministries allocate funds for such programs. Currently, direct business<br />

program funding resides within a ministry’s “envelope,” or annual funding allocati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Tax-based support is currently not counted as part <strong>of</strong> this allocati<strong>on</strong>. This hinders alignment<br />

and decreases efficiency, as m<strong>on</strong>ey cannot easily be shifted away from underperforming<br />

programs. As well, it <strong>of</strong>ten results in duplicated and unco-ordinated efforts by different<br />

ministries.<br />

Recommendati<strong>on</strong> 11-4: Starting in 2012–13, make ministries resp<strong>on</strong>sible and accountable<br />

for tax expenditures that align with <strong>the</strong>ir respective program areas. Ministries should initially<br />

be provided with <strong>the</strong> means to fund <strong>the</strong> tax expenditures (i.e., a net zero impact for <strong>the</strong><br />

ministries), but after that <strong>the</strong>y will have to manage <strong>the</strong> pooled envelope <strong>of</strong> tax expenditures<br />

and direct business support programs to meet budgetary targets.<br />

This will provide an incentive to tighten inefficient tax expenditures as <strong>the</strong> ministries<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>sible for <strong>the</strong> tax expenditures will have <strong>the</strong> ability to reform tax expenditures when<br />

seeking potential savings.<br />

311

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!