10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Recommendati<strong>on</strong> 1-1: We recommend <strong>the</strong> following annual changes in program spending<br />

out to 2017–18:<br />

� Health care — plus 2.5 per cent;<br />

� Educati<strong>on</strong> (primary and sec<strong>on</strong>dary) — plus 1.0 per cent;<br />

� Post-sec<strong>on</strong>dary educati<strong>on</strong> (excluding training) — plus 1.5 per cent;<br />

� Social services — plus 0.5 per cent; and<br />

� All o<strong>the</strong>r programs — minus 2.4 per cent. As in <strong>the</strong> example cited, this would imply an<br />

even bigger cut for everything except <strong>the</strong> fixed items referred to earlier; in this case, <strong>the</strong> cut<br />

would be in <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> 4.5 per cent.<br />

This permits post-sec<strong>on</strong>dary educati<strong>on</strong> grants to almost keep pace with enrolment and<br />

provides a more realistic path for n<strong>on</strong>-health, n<strong>on</strong>-educati<strong>on</strong>, n<strong>on</strong>-social services spending.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> latter programs, it still represents a very significant degree <strong>of</strong> restraint — a cumulative<br />

decline in <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> spending <strong>of</strong> about 15.6 per cent over seven years — even though a<br />

significant porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> this “everything else” category is ei<strong>the</strong>r fully committed by historical<br />

arrangements such as amortizati<strong>on</strong> and pensi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s or simply unwise to cut,<br />

such as existing shared-cost agreements, where <strong>the</strong> province would be giving up federal<br />

dollars. For everything o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> fixed items, <strong>the</strong> cumulative decline would come to<br />

about 27 per cent over seven years.<br />

As menti<strong>on</strong>ed earlier, program spending would rise by $6.3 billi<strong>on</strong> between 2010–11 and<br />

2017–18. Our recommendati<strong>on</strong> implies <strong>the</strong> following changes for <strong>the</strong> major program<br />

categories: health, up $8.4 billi<strong>on</strong>; educati<strong>on</strong> (primary and sec<strong>on</strong>dary), up $1.6 billi<strong>on</strong>;<br />

post-sec<strong>on</strong>dary educati<strong>on</strong>, up $0.7 billi<strong>on</strong>; social services, up $0.5 billi<strong>on</strong>; all o<strong>the</strong>r programs,<br />

down $4.0 billi<strong>on</strong>. 7<br />

7 These items add to $7.2 billi<strong>on</strong>. An operating reserve would be up $0.3 billi<strong>on</strong>, but year-end savings, a standard feature <strong>of</strong> Ontario’s<br />

budgeting, would subtract $1.2 billi<strong>on</strong>, leaving <strong>the</strong> $6.3 billi<strong>on</strong> total increase in program spending.<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!