10.12.2012 Views

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In making our revenue projecti<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> upshot is this:<br />

� We have adopted <strong>the</strong> short-term ec<strong>on</strong>omic assumpti<strong>on</strong>s found in <strong>the</strong> fall update;<br />

� To <strong>the</strong>se, we have appended our prudent medium-term ec<strong>on</strong>omic assumpti<strong>on</strong>s out<br />

to 2017–18;<br />

� We substantially weakened <strong>the</strong> revenue numbers in <strong>the</strong> fall update through 2013–14 to<br />

fully reflect <strong>the</strong> deteriorated ec<strong>on</strong>omic outlook and <strong>the</strong> very current actual data, such that<br />

our revenue forecast for 2013–14 is $0.8 billi<strong>on</strong> lower than that in <strong>the</strong> fall update despite<br />

being based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> same ec<strong>on</strong>omic assumpti<strong>on</strong>s; and<br />

� We have appended what we view as more appropriate revenue growth numbers<br />

bey<strong>on</strong>d 2013–14.<br />

Compared with <strong>the</strong> 2011 Budget, we see a weaker short-term ec<strong>on</strong>omic outlook, weaker<br />

medium-term ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth rates, weaker short-term revenue growth and weaker mediumterm<br />

revenue growth numbers. Accordingly, our revenue numbers are significantly below <strong>the</strong><br />

Budget track in each year. And for three <strong>of</strong> those four reas<strong>on</strong>s (<strong>the</strong> first no l<strong>on</strong>ger applies),<br />

our revenue numbers are substantially below <strong>the</strong> fall update in every year.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> period from 2013–14 to 2017–18, <strong>the</strong> Budget assumed annual revenue growth <strong>of</strong><br />

5.0 per cent, a pace exceeding <strong>the</strong> apparent 4.5 per cent projecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> annual growth in<br />

nominal GDP. Instead, we have projected revenue growth <strong>of</strong> about 3.7 per cent annually,<br />

below our 4.1 per cent expectati<strong>on</strong> for annual growth in nominal GDP. That is why our Status<br />

Quo Scenario sees total revenues <strong>of</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly $132.7 billi<strong>on</strong> in 2017–18, $9.5 billi<strong>on</strong> less than <strong>the</strong><br />

Budget Scenario’s <strong>of</strong> $142.2 billi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

We do see some room for a small amount <strong>of</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al revenue growth without raising taxes.<br />

A variety <strong>of</strong> modest revenue measures could yield almost $2 billi<strong>on</strong> in annual revenue by<br />

2017–18. These would involve a variety <strong>of</strong> measures: new strategies <strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>traband tobacco<br />

and <strong>the</strong> underground ec<strong>on</strong>omy; better compliance with existing tax rules; better targeting <strong>of</strong> or<br />

eliminating some tax expenditures; and additi<strong>on</strong>al revenues from Crown agencies. Such<br />

initiatives, which we have incorporated in our Preferred Scenario, could bring total revenues<br />

in 2017–18 to $134.7 billi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!