The Bhikṣuṇī Maṇimēkhalai

284 - Buddhist Logic
the generality nor any other attribute what is stated to exist in the
Dharmin or the minor term, is made to be non-existent, and thus
becomes contradictory.
The fourth consists in the establishment of the non-existence of the
attributes in the Dharmin or the minor term. In the example given
above, the Bhava or existence is the doing and the quality of the doer.
Since this is contradicted, it may also be taken as contradicting that
which is predicated in the middle term.
Fallacious Example
These are what are called
or examples containing
fallacies. It was already stated that is of two kinds, namely,
Sādharmya and [216] Vaidharmya (or homogeneous and
heterogeneous). Of these the former is of five kinds:–
(1) Sādhanadharmavikalam, or imperfect middle;
(2) Sādhyadharmavikalam, defective major term;
(3) Ubhayadharmavikalam, defective major and middle;
(4) Ananvayam, non-concomitance, and
(5) Viparīta-anvayam (contradictory concomitance)
Similarly heterogeneous example is also of five kinds, namely:–
(1) Sādhya- (not heterogeneous from the opposite of the
major term);
(2) Sādhana- (not heterogeneous from the opposite of the
middle term);
(3) Ubhaya- (heterogeneous from neither the opposite of the
middle term nor the opposite of the major term);
(4) Avyatirēkha (a heterogeneous example showing the absence of
disconnection between the middle term and the major term);