The Bhikṣuṇī Maṇimēkhalai

286 - Buddhist Logic
Sound is eternal
Because it is non-corporeal
Whatever is non-corporeal is eternal like a pot.
Here the pot, which is brought in as an example being a product, does
not partake of the character of the eternal as predicated in the major,
nor of the character of non-corporeality predicated in the middle;
thus it shows itself to be defective both in respect of the major and in
respect of the middle. Asadubhayadharmavikalam shows a similar
double defect in a thing non-existent, as in the example
Sound is non-eternal
Because it is corporeal
Whatever is corporeal is non-eternal like ākāśa (ether). [218]
In this the example Ākāśa does not partake of the character of
non-eternality predicated in the major, nor the corporeality
predicated in the middle, to him who states that Ākāsa is non-existent.
On the other hand, to one who believes in Ākāsa being existent, it is
eternal, and non-corporeal. Therefore to him also it is defective both
in respect of the major and in respect of the middle.
(4) Ananvayam (non-concomitance in example) consists in the middle
and the major, without stating the connection between the two,
exhibiting the real character of both, as in the example,
Sound is not eternal
Because it is a product
A pot is a product and non-eternal.
In this example the general concomitance that ‘whatever is a product
is not eternal’ not being stated, the concomitance between the major
and the middle is not made clear.