The Bhikṣuṇī Maṇimēkhalai

287 - Buddhist Logic
(5) Viparita-anvayam (the contradictory concomitance). This consists
in establishing concomitance merely by the concomitance of the
example with that which is predicated in the major term, as in the
example,
Sound is non-eternal
Because it is a product
Whatever is not eternal is a product.
In saying so, concomitance fails, because the universal statement
whatever is a product is not eternal, is not stated, and therefore it fails
in as much as the major is not drawn as a conclusion from the middle;
on the contrary, the statement of universal concomitance is made
from the major term. The defect consists in this; what is predicated in
the major may be more extensive than that which is stated in the
middle term, as in whatever is not eternal is a product. [219]
(1) Sādhya- consists in the example being incompatible with
that which is predicated in the middle while it is not so with what is
predicated in the major; as in the example,
Sound is eternal
Because it is non-corporeal
Whatever is non-eternal is also not non-corporeal as Paramāṇu.
In this example, the paramāṇu which is brought in as an example,
being eternal and corporeal as well, it is incompatible with the
non-corporeality predicated in the middle, while it is compatible with
the eternality predicated in the major.
(2) Sādhana- consists in the example being incompatible with
what is predicated in the major while it is not so with that which is
predicated in the middle; as in the example,