22.03.2013 Views

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

Mozley: A Treatise on the Augustinian Doctrine of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

206 <strong>Augustinian</strong><br />

<strong>Doctrine</strong> CHAP. TUT.<br />

Church at large does, as a mystery and with a reserve, and<br />

to hold it as a definite and complete doctrine.<br />

The language <strong>of</strong> S. Augustine respecting <strong>the</strong> will may<br />

be pat under two heads ; under <strong>the</strong> first <strong>of</strong> which it does<br />

not come up to <strong>the</strong> received doctrine <strong>of</strong> freewill, and under<br />

<strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d is opposed to it.<br />

I. First, freewill, as maintained by S. Augustine, does<br />

not mean so much as <strong>the</strong> freewill above described, or a<br />

self-determining will ; but <strong>on</strong>ly a ivill ; his language not<br />

advancing bey<strong>on</strong>d that point up to which <strong>the</strong> doctrine <strong>of</strong><br />

freewill and <strong>the</strong> opposite doctrine agree.<br />

In examining <strong>the</strong> language <strong>of</strong> Augustine <strong>on</strong> this sub<br />

ject we must take care to distinguish between what he says<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> freewill <strong>of</strong> man in his former perfect, and that <strong>of</strong><br />

man in his present corrupt state. In <strong>the</strong> book De Libero<br />

Arbitrio, a freewill is indeed described which comes up to<br />

<strong>the</strong> above definiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> it as original and self-determining.<br />

The Manichean <strong>the</strong>re, not c<strong>on</strong>tent with <strong>the</strong> fact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

human will as accounting for moral evil in <strong>the</strong> world,<br />

demands <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> that will ; and Augustine replies :<br />

The will being <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> sin, you ask <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

will : should I discover it, will you not ask <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> cause<br />

<strong>of</strong> that cause ; and what limit <strong>of</strong> inquiry can <strong>the</strong>re be, if<br />

you will go deeper than <strong>the</strong> very root ? . . . . What cause<br />

<strong>of</strong> will can <strong>the</strong>re be before will ? For ei<strong>the</strong>r this cause is<br />

will, and we are no nearer <strong>the</strong> root than we were before ; or<br />

it is not will, and in that case <strong>the</strong>re is no sin. 1 Here a<br />

will is described which is truly an original agent in nature,<br />

no cause but itself. But <strong>the</strong> will thus described is<br />

having<br />

<strong>the</strong> will <strong>of</strong> man in his created, not in his fallen state. 2 In<br />

some passages, again, quoted in a former chapter, a will<br />

was described which was self-determining and original ; for<br />

it was said that <strong>the</strong> first man had such an assistance given<br />

him as he could use if he willed, and neglect if he willed ;<br />

not <strong>on</strong>e by which it was caused that he did will. 3 His will,<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore, had no cause bey<strong>on</strong>d itself, or was self-caused,<br />

1 L. 3. c. xvii. qua homo factus est loquimur.<br />

2 Cum autem de libera voluntate L. 3. c. 18.<br />

faciendi loquimur, de ilia scilicet in 8 De Corr. et Grat. e. xi.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!